Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 30 April 2014 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A1D1A0942 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1fuayaMe5Jp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E551A6FFE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.39] (rrcs-67-53-121-163.west.biz.rr.com [67.53.121.163]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2033922B20; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:52:59 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1398880379; bh=cESj7yl1r4uthdqAfON2DGDDPSNn6BBJgL60RHEPkdY=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fwwty87VwsuDTyd1VJZ8vA1nJJDHKQANmOrKj0FN7bTUbtF2Ezvi5gup7xkW44xGd 9eCctrrZNheZqUNu47LlbgsOcwu68FrTp56LA1RwrUAbn3/qAYqJQSegeCnFsAwr0w P2/9TEYBV2FzGeYWLmU43QcUcLVP+a0fSyNmy5yk=
Message-ID: <5361387A.5070805@dougbarton.us>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:52:58 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <534BFA08.3030404@foobar.org> <49EA8AC9-D5C5-4FE5-9A10-0CD574782F0F@nominum.com> <534C07FC.8000907@foobar.org> <F08AF14D-22C6-4F4C-9388-670EB4CD8453@nominum.com> <F2A0EC2F-6B41-4560-88BA-CEBF3E921B61@delong.com> <CAEmG1=oK8iHAms2_uVBsCtpCG7xBdhRfh9QQrd+JXUXgjBPqPA@mail.gmail.com> <0901D65B-EA79-4E20-987D-9BA01CEDDAB3@delong.com> <B3942C2F-C08E-42F2-9038-92C3C63E0023@nominum.com> <5360B37B.8010908@dougbarton.us> <F350FDDA-645B-42B3-90EB-70D8852E8435@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <F350FDDA-645B-42B3-90EB-70D8852E8435@nominum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.7a1pre
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0MN1v2wM3IoooEU5Ofw9olskFDE
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:53:03 -0000

On 04/30/2014 05:37 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:
>> as others have pointed out this is layering violation of monumental proportions
>
> Are you trolling me, Doug?

I'm not sure why you would say that, or why you would snip one phrase 
out of my entire e-mail to respond to and ignore all of the other 
arguments I made about why this draft is a bad idea.

Doug