IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Thu, 17 April 2014 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336301A043E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.262
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.262 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bP-PMcJUY-24 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6DD1A043C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (ip-64-134-38-51.public.wayport.net [64.134.38.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s3H429O5003151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:02:11 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com s3H429O5003151
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1397707333; bh=t/3WOLU0fne4nMOI5xQycXJRBzo=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Message-Id:References:To; b=BiV/9HT+rsrYOwVdUlRSSGuTKM6OgEMSCVZnntXd9k1zg/d8Ohmd/4Fd2Y00tGqQA y2gF4cyARC9u0Ujh9TegrS0onlinuIuwZbhPi8wyj9iTHnypoMcW2yR+WqRj/mMqY6 VB+ZRMZV4zv5friF6NTD7brhFgQBoo2/UfDP/jSQ=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_161F03C2-22F2-4616-9C00-9C0BE07BFDE5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1pQ4kYPpOT80ahZPWZD+2ystr28Jm1G77j4DsOomGtcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:02:07 -0700
Message-Id: <264E5E20-1891-4218-913F-8C8D80414E1B@delong.com>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <20140415083615.GB43641@Space.Net> <534D3672.3060702@viagenie.ca> <3446106.k0lm12lQ8b@linne> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161034220.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr2D+ZMi-UctuvrMzyqoHqgBy5O26GODT=bRwq0PsvLgLw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161053110.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1WaMBx-0000BSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E772899C-8505-4436-8594-380799F91BA0@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr2KFOi_hW3CCSbcT-uPQSwsUyE06cY3r8=CuunSbnz_xw@mail.gmail.com> <D701ADC0-EA9F-48DD-933F-9E02ACF3EBD4@nominum.com> <534EAB83.1070906@foobar.org> <70739713-281A-41E6-93ED-5EE1BC4B7FAB@nominum.com> <534EC1DB.4010902@foobar.org> <575F73AC-8DA5-4E04-B2CF-4875B729C7D3@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr3u4=iWd54OztARdJT-ENNAT-YOJO5FuKrtTtFAd64NVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1pQ4kYPpOT80ahZPWZD+2ystr28Jm1G77j4DsOomGtcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pb1vywWt29Di1hUicijEfjtCZP0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 04:02:50 -0000

On Apr 16, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> This option makes it much worse: if a rogue RA sender or rogue DHCPv6 server sends out a "kill IPv4" option, then the hosts are dead in the water.
> 
> Ted - for the avoidance of doubt, I assert that this is a "this won't work because FOO" objection. :-)

+1

Owen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email