IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 15 April 2014 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634691A04A9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FoSod7UPzEZP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD03A1A048A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:2520:ef8a:477:622f]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA4574038F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <534D5BD1.5020406@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:18:25 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <CAKD1Yr0j5+r6K8APoFageJz2RESKj5vkk10Ybom0p3Vec_G0YQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2k3argftt.wl%Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404151026060.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20140415083615.GB43641@Space.Net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404151048250.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4E64CF95-F984-48F2-AEFA-A3E9FF9D38A3@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E64CF95-F984-48F2-AEFA-A3E9FF9D38A3@delong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9PeUrM72p9lvnGY6ln3ryGGumic
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:18:30 -0000

Le 2014-04-15 11:09, Owen DeLong a écrit :
> I would support an RA flag that says “If you’re reading this message, don’t do IPv4 on this network”.
> 
> That’s not even close to what is proposed here.

Uh?

At the very least, it was our intent to propose that very thing. An IPv4
kill switch.

> What is proposed here is a variety of IPv6 methods for telling a client to turn off it’s IPv4 dynamic configuration requests and there’s no reason to put that into IPv6 at all.

I'm sorry, I'm not following.

If your problem is with "variety of methods", then I can understand. We
started with DHCPv6 only, then we added RA because people were asking
for it. We expect one could be removed if it poses a problem.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email