IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 30 April 2014 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A551A6F6A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sn_rvn3dNKT6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EE41A6F63 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id EEEBFA6; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1398862125; bh=Evew2P57y8U+mTUPHRCmewxmGBKrKHGsOpkmxRs9/FM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kK9pifZ0jQFX+9a4ujRWQu0MGUW2JCo1ltmCwlDd22m98rPwBlWHOT5VAi2u98iDk Vtdd5jERmqEahSHorj2TwaRIEhTh4gDkIyDaoWAPCpGTjtsADPHzJk5/+v6zHUSg7b AeU6UOFo10v2PPSu+RrToMdWYwO0Q7EIsbI1Aljw=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60B3A5; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:48:45 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <5360DE96.3070407@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404301447180.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <9B4139A3-77F7-4109-93AD-A822395E5007@nominum.com> <m2mwf59uht.wl%Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <7310412C-64E9-4A11-9812-92A969082131@nominum.com> <20140428190804.GK43641@Space.Net> <446A720E-1128-4FFF-BB3B-780EACA9610B@nominum.com> <535EBC20.10900@foobar.org> <20140428213045.GL511@havarti.local> <19B5B5AB-FF86-408B-8E73-D5350853965B@foobar.org> <3563D9EE-CD40-4E75-A1CB-C3FB50EEEBC4@nominum.com> <535F3624.4020801@foobar.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404290726011.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> <535F3A8C.2050902@foobar.org> <E68028C1-2E6D-4D07-A113-60757457E286@nominum.com> <535F99A9.3030402@foobar.org> <0C03200E-B349-44D4-BE3F-512AD6A7A417@nominum.com> <535FCB2C.3030502@foobar.org> <8DB83B3D-D09C-4977-9B4F-75EA2DD3B71D@nominum.com> <53601BED.4050200@foobar.org> <37DC9152-EEE3-4EEF-81C7-AD5B6D0E9892@nominum.com> <B5BC5D48-3D5D-40A4-89F6-B0E1AEC860D6@steffann.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404301203260.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5360DE96.3070407@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9Afqca4lCfD6GSci2uUb1HL0E4g
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:48:53 -0000

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> On 30/04/2014 11:04, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> as well. Network-wide change that can be done programatically.
>
> if both the hardware and software support it.  As we're talking about
> legacy stuff here, this may not be the case.

I don't understand what part of my statement you object to. The 
programmatical change statement, the IPv4+ARP ethertypes solely being 
allowed, or something else?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email