IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Tue, 15 April 2014 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5701A06B1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.263
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQuu5W5jy5KY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994161A06A3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.102] (ip-64-134-38-51.public.wayport.net [64.134.38.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s3F4oBnF031599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:50:13 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com s3F4oBnF031599
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1397537415; bh=6qgU205E6wt3M0ODheyqo7kU9iU=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=lLBZ+1xUpH+bQvLX1oFFb1Ket4odgJNd5h9M2Dtpk7S0bITNAQBSThONFEJ36/13L 7PID/t84H0UtIeHo9/khE3ZWAIaT+sGqp4VNkBhOLF+734sZLp7hmOqw92Sr/3O6Hk d+TlBcJ6QMCnn83k0HvSUO61x0utkB7O9y+mJ/xI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <230F179C-D5F3-4FB5-B068-C06549631BA7@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:50:09 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F2DF90B2-53D6-431A-A8CE-DC2CF9D411CD@delong.com>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <534BFA08.3030404@foobar.org> <49EA8AC9-D5C5-4FE5-9A10-0CD574782F0F@nominum.com> <534C07FC.8000907@foobar.org> <F08AF14D-22C6-4F4C-9388-670EB4CD8453@nominum.com> <F2A0EC2F-6B41-4560-88BA-CEBF3E921B61@delong.com> <091F7BAB-2AAC-41B3-A67C-540482323E71@nominum.com> <3AAA3A70-1513-4163-A841-45FEFC95004C@delong.com> <230F179C-D5F3-4FB5-B068-C06549631BA7@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pP4HNKJVlyrfus9UOUqr2SUuBSY
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 04:53:43 -0000

On Apr 14, 2014, at 8:12 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Apr 14, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> Please explain to me why this is any more massive of a change to DHCPv4 than it would be to DHCPv6.
> 
> Because you are changing the protocol state machine.

So, you’re saying having some external process kill the DHCP4 client in response to a message received via DHCPv6 is less of a change to the protocol state machine than having DHCPv4 client die in response to a similar message… Right.

Owen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email