IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 22 April 2014 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266671A0686 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dHZ00sBMD-SS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBF71A0677 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22A91B803F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BEF19005C; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:39:13 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2f-RH4i3creThGGSx2YxdUTbEW1ACW_0TXz857Kbmv7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:39:11 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <9B4139A3-77F7-4109-93AD-A822395E5007@nominum.com>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <20140415083615.GB43641@Space.Net> <534D3672.3060702@viagenie.ca> <3446106.k0lm12lQ8b@linne> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161034220.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr2D+ZMi-UctuvrMzyqoHqgBy5O26GODT=bRwq0PsvLgLw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161053110.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20140416155714.GB64039@ricotta.doit.wisc.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404162310050.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <B21C1073-ABBE-44FE-964F-65AD7849CD31@delong.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404170658440.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4EABCE38-7CBA-4C95-84EE-686A2300F26E@delong.com> <8E450CDC-FFC5-4649-89FE-387836C8E40B@nominum.com> <CAEmG1=oNyotn6tcKyxUuLCW0of-MxVrvUB08jsygjo8kidgt0g@mail.gmail.com> <CF7BDD91.1911D%wesley.george@twcable.com> <m1Wcb5y-0000FMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <BD6D04D4-AD31-462D-A0C7-AD74DBCF23AD@nominum.com> <m1WcbPl-0000COC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <118D079B-FC99-4606-B289-4201137A5815@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr2f-RH4i3creThGGSx2YxdUTbEW1ACW_0TXz857Kbmv7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VSpfCH_HvxudBj6QDFoR_s8ncoI
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:39:21 -0000

On Apr 22, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> In networks that support only IPv4, filtering DHCPv4 packets is probably supported. Filtering DHCPv6 or RA packets may not be supported and may require hardware upgrades. On such networks, the damage from rogue DHCPv6 or RA packets is mitigated by happy eyeballs. The damage from rogue "shut down your entire IPv4 stack" options cannot be.

Do you have data on this, or is it just supposition?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email