Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 17 April 2014 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11931A001A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aYvCK5-KT6tk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DF41A000E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hl10so152874igb.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tiM4ALjXgz2/a7dmvNbsXbPcvMcRRJKNSxCxz5mIUIg=; b=RM4hikdt3ZOsjnnHT4KQz4RZO34yrGmj9g/LjZP9xIOv5CMZek/iPp9l70OEQe44mJ 5pALy8BmwuhxVm2sZlyH9lWGXcPngOGqVV0QwoinkgBRCtUxypxZT+Dq7tM0WARJFTou UKEEvZsDYlv5/TMDVnubHsqM9RrJ9nZjvQQFggInUsrTqj1fzxismtH5gMVp3CXDuVqs vVceTzSJ08N30cEPig/i/S9rY2EzeDj5aiVQ4HcpDM57EV1cHKhoUBEwiL80Yk3RaJkH lQPbH4fEnM12/llMaFy8C6BfieNiuv9K7ZL8ufELuzFaCOyAJ+voWSNZ+fHedUtiv15k 48qw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=tiM4ALjXgz2/a7dmvNbsXbPcvMcRRJKNSxCxz5mIUIg=; b=XRVWY4Zcoco9uoA7eZMTSJ/7ExiAyNuiJYOGqlnXr11A+iAhgrMIB8+HZwVkb3pjmn niJWPgiQRw+TFtg7w7UBjwY7JhMLa8nbWCPwy/5yjfLX/hl02jqhSav0ump3KCDJunRn wvWtBBNGp7bAQZ0gdnuAhEIfDBr+RmhKpzcC7xvD+pJR0o/spSndNz+1EaGYwb8x+5N2 8lyXFPxjU2gGqS97+Bz+ruZpSdif1bV8w+tHb66wjp0nGynBWSDwe8ha1rAbH1M2OhLs RMR7QPD8UBFUFsElpcWYVdlpRlxR9IdrT8wDdtKQ2Zm7KSAws9tQVdjCFNfSmA1vqUfu k3tA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwkqKM4bjM//E9EIQ04ujaGpnRZRsmUNwKv27eIBdB3/6wwOkHvkPwfcyxGA8ml/UC3RoObC4GenOqGkXL1l4KGDrivR4s2zHModrctsQAIyoiF3QtTRmXKnGLsQTe3PJDroerROz3xXKxwH/8P4TW3w2F2g6kK/LjOR8/hdQLQswP9mereb+iPLqM/m/BogC2hBmv
X-Received: by 10.50.114.99 with SMTP id jf3mr13627556igb.45.1397699068418; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.18.136 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3u4=iWd54OztARdJT-ENNAT-YOJO5FuKrtTtFAd64NVA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <20140415083615.GB43641@Space.Net> <534D3672.3060702@viagenie.ca> <3446106.k0lm12lQ8b@linne> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161034220.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr2D+ZMi-UctuvrMzyqoHqgBy5O26GODT=bRwq0PsvLgLw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161053110.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1WaMBx-0000BSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E772899C-8505-4436-8594-380799F91BA0@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr2KFOi_hW3CCSbcT-uPQSwsUyE06cY3r8=CuunSbnz_xw@mail.gmail.com> <D701ADC0-EA9F-48DD-933F-9E02ACF3EBD4@nominum.com> <534EAB83.1070906@foobar.org> <70739713-281A-41E6-93ED-5EE1BC4B7FAB@nominum.com> <534EC1DB.4010902@foobar.org> <575F73AC-8DA5-4E04-B2CF-4875B729C7D3@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr3u4=iWd54OztARdJT-ENNAT-YOJO5FuKrtTtFAd64NVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:44:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1pQ4kYPpOT80ahZPWZD+2ystr28Jm1G77j4DsOomGtcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b4146e07a04db04f7332c97"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1a9bp3CHT9Eix5hE_TKVctAODmA
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 01:44:32 -0000

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>wrote:

> This option makes it much worse: if a rogue RA sender or rogue DHCPv6
> server sends out a "kill IPv4" option, then the hosts are dead in the water.
>

Ted - for the avoidance of doubt, I assert that this is a "this won't work
because FOO" objection. :-)