Re: [Ext] Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey

[Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]>]

I am terrible at standing in the mic line so I can agree with Michael on
this.

Also, there is an oddity with the Zulip logs.  On the meeting material
pages, the link will send you the JSON blob:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/120/materials/chatlog-120-dnsop-202407251830-00

But I found (willing to bet Robert pointed it out to me) a much nicer
formatted version of the chat log:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/chatlog-120-dnsop-202407221530/


tim


On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
> I think that most WGs do a good job of having someone monitor the chat, and
> when things do need to get to mic, that happens.  Clarification questions,
> which can be answered by other people, are significantly useful.  Not only
> does it not take time away from the presenter, but it also might show
> whether
> the document has been reviewed, and by who.
>
> It would be useful if Jay could dig further into who complained, and which
> WGs for which this was a problem, and how new, middle or ?old? the people
> are.
>
> Secondly, going to the MIC can be a scary process; particularly for some
> neurodivegent people.  Asking the question in chat has a much lower bar.
>
> Finally, for those who are not physically present, the chat is a useful and
> significant way to connect to other participants.  For remote attendees,
> arranging windows in the right places is not hard.  I think that for many
> people, their "window manager" makes it hard for them to have any windows
> which aren't full screen, and frankly...<shuts up here>
> I think that it is the people who are trying to run meetecho on their
> laptop with the built-in client who are having problems.  The answer is to
> use the zulip web client.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
>