IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 09 April 2020 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2903A0F79 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 02:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EW7eI0JUrXQ6 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 02:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.117.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 402A03A0CC8 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 02:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FFA212C2; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:07:40 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58E5215DA; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:07:36 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from eggert.org (unknown [62.248.255.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eggert@elisanet.fi) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D11240004; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:07:33 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from stickers.eggert.org (stickers.eggert.org [172.24.110.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FB2C84E5A5; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:07:27 +0300 (EEST)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <09CE56D4-985B-41A4-AA8B-A459B4A5E696@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6D61CE8-C8CB-43AC-AEA0-2C4672600059"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:07:26 +0300
In-Reply-To: <6C2A3533-7F75-45B1-9B51-19938597174B@tzi.org>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <60a10451-5fbd-fcec-5389-7a72870dcc84@gmail.com> <6A3A4410-A889-46C7-8FD5-7C5AA85486A1@tzi.org> <20200408054204.GA6005@nic.fr> <6C2A3533-7F75-45B1-9B51-19938597174B@tzi.org>
X-MailScanner-ID: 1FB2C84E5A5.A806B
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/IpPzlGFzE-z_a1-nUGjOzB8XZ-k>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 09:07:44 -0000

On 2020-4-8, at 21:57, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> There has been a decade of “clean slate Internet” discussion, and only ICN emerged as an interesting new architecture from that context.  So I’m not very optimistic with any process that tries to relive that process.  But genuine new ideas do get generated now and then, and I would be quite interested to hear about them without the now obligatory press release bombast on how they will create cheaper battery technology for flying cars and cure Covid-19 at the same time.

+1

An even ICN has an uncertain road to larger-scale deployment.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email