Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 07:42:04AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1677/
> 
> It seems that IETF's answer is about another project, by ITU.

Yes.

>  ITU and ETSI have the same discourse

What information makes you think that ?
I do not think that that is true.

> <https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/2017-2020/13/Documents/Internet_2030%20.pdf>

That document was input to ITU-T Study Group 13 (SG13) for the start
of Focus Group 2030 (FGNET2030). FGNET203 was not formally involved
in the creation of the Liaison Statements referred to in the
liaison exchange pointed to by Carsten. Instead that was done
by ITU-T Telecommunication Standardization Advisory Group (TSAG)
probably with help from SG13.

There are ITU-T members and contributors who think that
topics related directly to the evolution of IP (often
referred to as "New IP") should be discussed by interested
 parties directly to IETF instead of of being brought
into some IMHO obfuscated leadership statements via some liaison
process. At least thats what i believe, which is why we
have inofficial IETF side meetings about "New IP" and other
related topics. But then again, this is from my team working
only in FGNET2030, but not having been involved in any of the
payload of the TSAG/SG13 liaison statements.

> but, apparently, they operate separately.

Yes. ETSI is a completely separate SDO from ITU,
Not a United Nations organization.

Cheers
    Toerless

> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss

-- 
---
[e-mail]