Re: List moderator action

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Stephen,
At 02:16 PM 28-04-2026, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>On 28/04/2026 21:55, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> > I still believe that there is a trivial solution to the problem,
> > which is for Daniel to exclude the dubious boilerplate.
>
>The above is also true and would be most welcome. I don't have a
>clue what he thinks is possibly being achieved by triggering the
>bans for no good reason (not to mention the giant appeals;-)

Yes (to both of the comments).

Here's the standards process angle:

   1. RFC 3934 was obsoleted.

   2. Section 3 of RFC 9245 was obsoleted.

   3. The second paragraph of Section 4 of RFC 9245 was obsoleted.

   4. There is a definition of "IETF Documents" in Section 1.f
      of RFC 5378.

I don't see how (4) would be applicable to an email.  The question 
then is whether Items (1), (2) or (3) could be applied.  There is a 
definition of the word "obsolete" at 
https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/obsolete

Regards,
S. Moonesamy