IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <robin@hookflash.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFD621F9E17 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.552, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TTf9qo4rXoov for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x229.google.com (mail-oa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8144F21F9E0B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n10so7026252oag.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=IaN+0DnuJYovU4dkjhkqUQBATmqrCMVoJQmb6ut4+us=; b=Ta8RZYgHL+z7B1lXKLqC4BaZF4vo/d7ErpoJDqVaDd551ueZPk+5koOKhzwu4S8nkQ gL1WXtJbnrBpiUNbxzUf6PsvfhoeMC6u/lGyCuGM82kzkuv5gtMgw3ohrKbzctcG6Vde viBNloND0flYk6pAHLrlz9+rwSifvUmcdMsg1cWLD1iWfsuIlveZEL4N9dtvQ5HjzTnV pRVM86BfZzXPlFPlSy/FgSOo68jiC2pmHC0XS0Ui/oQwM5AstWICVAfse57sVA3SVDaF 8b5r3VbmPADbT6RGmOub0d3AqGuF9Kg+mvauGlHOgaxMhLTpBLhFwFPvx8Oeiy7kALVV P7Kg==
X-Received: by 10.60.36.226 with SMTP id t2mr2062483oej.6.1371665133054; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Robins-MacBook-Pro.local (CPE602ad08742f7-CM602ad08742f4.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.224.116.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm26220139oem.3.2013.06.19.11.05.31 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:05:29 -0400
From: Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.8 (Macintosh/20130427)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070004000807050208050701"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkt+fcbWJoQvRMMwd34qOb4dt6mRf1yg7vNPAdhhWs0Qg4jeC95GUZVV+fTIwIuYY8pmiGa
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:05:34 -0000

Why aren't we using the JavaScript object model for control of 
components instead of serializing our control requests via SDP/whatever 
format and hoping that it worked?

-Robin


> Peter Thatcher <mailto:pthatcher@google.com>
> 19 June, 2013 12:49 PM
> I asked "is there something that can't be done without sufficient SDP 
> munging"?  You answered "I have something that can be done with 
> sufficient SDP munging".   OK.  But do you have something that *can't* 
> be done with SDP munging?
>
> If there's nothing that can't be done with SDP munging, then this 
> whole thread boils down to "give us an API that has the same amount of 
> control as the current one, but without requiring SDP munging to do 
> advanced things".  And if that's is what is desired, then at least it 
> can be clear and concise.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email