IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Sun, 07 December 2014 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAAA1A1A2F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:40:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUZUddHyQ3Qr for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:40:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112B81A1A23 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:40:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id k14so4461677wgh.23 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:40:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rER+bMeGVeoMz61Tk0u+e+o24bsPzkY9IheOcYxsX9A=; b=ZqsQrvAQqTaKp3PNyLgwr08gVO6lEIEfVP7JqvvMBSIsJ4T8GEbFdAphRrO1a4nrLA K/RtaS00PRulJdk8VOAj2sMKtFzjXDmvitcZjqcSz+HLsaOkq6TtOmmLXdLv7SLGTPUk LRnoCYXzs7Ipc90RVH6h1D+ugeQwiiX4tCqcICSycd7/LwD4PJ8/h36pRnzqSonngfqx euMOTuDjyCtfiBWR54w8v/zNYf63Qb/1GCjHCrhndSaIpDn9F/eo3xquEFNN0rnx3mcX UfVl4e8E+g20FrLXZ8qqfbAu7C3aNL6qgSLnbLaGuwaFl/ypRwvfXHShWXfSj+tFpB/6 qiTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXBL9GFvq7nDl8zGYmWbXYnf7wV9pd5gK8huDknqX5fnUTsOHHWGz27sENwMM36zeKWq6u
X-Received: by 10.194.174.3 with SMTP id bo3mr35293894wjc.98.1417970441909; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com. [74.125.82.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gi5sm53182001wjd.26.2014.12.07.08.40.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z12so4537571wgg.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:40:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.76.7 with SMTP id g7mr18705139wiw.38.1417970440520; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.70.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:40:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtnQDkKQOohVFdQ1n5+2GU7rjHNjsUH4r3Scv_kc7y6UA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <547511DB.5050100@nostrum.com> <54759A4C.6020806@gmail.com> <5476092D.4010406@nostrum.com> <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com> <547F60A8.3080302@alvestrand.no> <27F838F1-326D-48BD-B553-6FE993E5C34F@apple.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF354465@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <547FA924.3000504@mozilla.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF35455C@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <548052E7.1050007@alvestrand.no> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF359C76@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <548203E2.90602@nostrum.com> <20141206054017.5955730.89689.3585@blackberry.com> <CAD5OKxtnQDkKQOohVFdQ1n5+2GU7rjHNjsUH4r3Scv_kc7y6UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 11:40:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtjafk9VCu9SCxX42wqiqLRSS6gX=CwRKmUhAqirr6Uvg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043893c768c8600509a2f8b8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/c9TkioT3GzqFV_EpTgOtBq2H_EI
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:40:45 -0000

There were a lot of arguments here about the Nokia IPR declaration
regarding VP8. IANAL, but typically there is a very simple way to determine
the validity of the IPR claim. It comes down to one simple question -- Have
the party claiming IPR violation filed the law suite? If not, their claims
most likely do not justify the court filing fees in their own eyes. Mozilla
and Google have been shipping browsers with VP8 codec support for several
years already and Nokia did not do a single thing to stop this. If Nokia is
serious about their IPR claims, they should take the alleged violators to
court. At least this way there is going to be a definitive decision
regarding the validity of these claims.

_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email