Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 19 June 2013 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7C421F9DDB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFUzdL7Enonf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8772121F9DD8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n1so3246748qcw.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=O7UKS8R4c2tjtzaKIe5aSULODLjhYxiAnxuWNxCHLt8=; b=I0kLtJVyetMMrY3KooIxw9P/6VF/nRDIfpjn+k9KtEcNxDSf7duLxpNrq5yDvRrT71 Omma7cazB72mlYbIovhVWqYnRkbsmvGA//2NUuj1QoDZsVOeSnSHXU37DDNJ116ru1u4 iMwMulg8lpQSW0J+sqJhIsntOzNUUx6+GQa88AAyyWdHqA7KwU+9jJs7M3QylFG6CAzS uBQAqaiAzEQ2OWicpzv2+PxuZIyBLhMljoo74fh+FI65i43jHLNTSBBWpJbkChRfS2Fl uJU4EojV6Hmn2o2LEI8NDMSrved7ZCMWnUyK+hZVi5PyH3f2reTFbSdC+/OH9Xa0wI0E m3XA==
X-Received: by 10.229.147.71 with SMTP id k7mr1518966qcv.129.1371663943775; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.67.65 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUGqTGCR3reZ3=PkzQE7bhvjhyNGpdCiM-TCDnusNOxjjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk39prkSinDCisSqOAD8yJZuGUwLAMBabao7eHuhnAYcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHe=vu2695xAkg2tKvQ7J5JNqraHCpY0rKx5rDQ0xCpiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=GbR3K0dzMkaMWu88WdNY4JWQOmDPKeNfZQNuC5d4bog@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHG7ENOu12SkRpXOik3ArEShPHAJhtOwYyR3UaSDvQFOA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=SiPkCD6b1Z+hkgkbtT1bbxtytWyYRxH3CUGDvJOztRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUF6uujp2jYCJgxp4kTctAFDWBBU-bWhJp4iMNDuc6A+3w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfm_CLRBTmuJhjhrxNb5XPHGmFD9Lip37xYLVOBTxM6j_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUGqTGCR3reZ3=PkzQE7bhvjhyNGpdCiM-TCDnusNOxjjQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:45:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfkPFE0Oywqz6GRUkZE1jWKKMPa88JqFT84eJuDdTJ+2tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9pu8tqK476lGWiaavEhhXd5Pch3IFG1rCC/o6YDb+F0P5WRLD8gd0ObmDnbIxu62zqraP
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:46 -0000

2013/6/19 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>;:
> I don't think it's removal of SDP that you want.  I think what you want is a
> way to use the API without using SDP.  If the SDP is still there, but you
> don't have to use it, you're still happy, right?

AFAIK no API in the world provides two ways to do the same, or at
least, no API provide them with the same "quality" and "affection".
Duplicating the work does not seem a long-term solution IMHO.

But I may be wrong :)


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>;