IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> Tue, 23 June 2015 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mueller@syr.edu>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066B61A21C4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3DP_Agielr6j for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.syr.edu (smtp2.syr.edu [128.230.18.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203281A21C3 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX13-MBX-07.ad.syr.edu (ex13-mbx-07.ad.syr.edu [128.230.108.138]) by smtp2.syr.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t5NLjI2k006156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:45:18 -0400
Received: from EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu (128.230.108.144) by EX13-MBX-07.ad.syr.edu (128.230.108.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:45:17 -0400
Received: from EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu ([128.230.108.144]) by EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu ([128.230.108.144]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.040; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:45:11 -0400
From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
Thread-Index: AQHQqqenoggMxPgiBEmwD7ntlA4q2p20P26AgAATEACAACPEgIAAFRGAgABM3gCAAA5oAIAAEJcAgAGjMgCAAAWdgIAAnmwAgAAzxICAAAVBgIAA0omAgACEjICAAAStgIAAAUoAgAEXRYCAAERcgIAABM/AgAB1y4D//+xlMA==
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:45:11 +0000
Message-ID: <4537f87485c348a3aaebacfc270023e9@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
References: <20150619170708.84611.qmail@ary.lan> <3F18936E1587B5F2BB89E800@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <55847BE9.9040507@gmail.com> <5584BC64.7060403@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506192151170.47260@ary.local> <5584D664.90003@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506201928040.47864@ary.local> <55863ABF.8020903@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211008240.48224@ary.local> <5586EB11.5030404@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211400250.48860@ary.local> <5587A015.9030700@cisco.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506221032250.50421@ary.local> <55881331.9070902@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506221056420.50578@ary.local> <5588FE8B.3040806@gmail.com> <CAKFn1SGxChn3kK=DXApAhpn6y=HB69wOWnYjDPzFmz_QmGUxjg@mail.gmail.com> <afa93173fcf645cba12c127913ff2c3e@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <CAD_dc6huVqKhB=cVQ4rKyfCxqVhWeWR7_Mj0FgzAJEdy52oEnw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD_dc6huVqKhB=cVQ4rKyfCxqVhWeWR7_Mj0FgzAJEdy52oEnw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [201.234.152.56]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4537f87485c348a3aaebacfc270023e9EX13MBX13adsyredu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-06-23_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1502090000 definitions=main-1506230349
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/0RaWTTW7boXbUFrQtSrKfxPIpBo>
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:45:23 -0000


Just to clarify Milton, the CWG proposal gives certain "exclusivity" on IANA trademarks to PTI so i don't think it would be sufficient to say there are no direction on this from the CWG proposal. As to those who support moving to IETF trust, i am one of such people but mine is not with a necessity clause.

MM: Seun here are the exact words of the chair of the CWG on this matter:
“…the TM related language in the Final Proposal is preceded by other text and contained in square brackets such that the Final Proposal effectively does not make a specific proposal with regard to the trademark.”

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email