[Ianaplan] Strickling says not this year

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 21 June 2015 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6871A8A7C for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.763
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.763 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_80=2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J21Dkenbcli7 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897C61A8A7D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 86704 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2015 22:26:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=152af.55873a29.k1506; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=sYhWAVghxzZZO79rGXWHU81/8Nkm98xVQEgo8k86tJs=; b=Gi3qyuzhZBWroExh1RD7IizmZpCigmtbc0PUDyNrd+Jlppe0iHEWMstvrN0E3jPtcNy0p54/4Jrdc5v6Oy50frMsUQiVh+3S84Wiguq3f0kwbAdOjqqXvRzJJChGU//ZPf+10QCoXbM04HT3MZxSPmZB9JtyOkFY6p9zNNZro4lMGU0oE8Zb1MfqfMmMGIqBkYuTl8BuVfZ+tRkJRmCmcKiNSzvw/FGwQfhoyQamXqYX3LkgdqeilPtmavGAIwD2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=152af.55873a29.k1506; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=sYhWAVghxzZZO79rGXWHU81/8Nkm98xVQEgo8k86tJs=; b=pVyaNoeMSHOE95gYkp82guzkb5sDUCybfJ9QbWil76zw4t6gRN1+Sd/iQD45bUqaTzatSkG2yWPdxiH9x3E2mGCrqU8ML4EFVza85eUFXanS78p3VsSBsqsQpIBu9HX0Q8c4VgyzXzj3BIuvqSvni3yAy+aDlQPFuKhubxsu7S2CbBsTwg1TaXn0LFvkOXKe9M3jgMAgVIlm39L9Y5BDAQNafmYh4eYc7OjlQ6be9uQxvgexd+fKLIeQKfLHyFRA
Received: from [IPv6:2620:f:8000:210:4c8:8f9d:1e1f:4e07] ([IPv6:2620:f:8000:210:4c8:8f9d:1e1f:4e07]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 21 Jun 2015 22:26:49 -0000
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 19:26:32 -0300
Message-ID: <9fb6a8c9-04d2-475b-bd7a-e879dbc210d9@email.android.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Android-Message-ID: <9fb6a8c9-04d2-475b-bd7a-e879dbc210d9@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150621185912.86082.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/TJyXqbRUu9dFY1HOoqTJKk0vkSo>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Strickling says not this year
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 22:26:43 -0000

The question is whether to extend the current deal for the full two years or maybe less.
So we can definitely wait and see what the names crowd proposes. N

R's from my fone,
John

On Jun 21, 2015 3:59 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
> >I've heard, and respect, the argument that we have no choice 
> >but, if that is really the case, I hope someone will make the 
> >point to NTIA and ICANN (perhaps at this afternoon's forum) that 
> >this effort is actually expensive and causing damage to the 
> >Internet.    
>
> I'll be there, albeit not in any official role. 
>
> R's, 
> John