Re: [Ianaplan] "IANA.ZONE" and other entities and strategies (was: Re: Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name_

[Jefsey <[e-mail]>]

At 19:29 23/06/2015, John C Klensin wrote:
>I also don't understand the ISO reference.  I'm at least vaguely 
>familiar with most of the TCs (and JTC1 SC2) that might take 
>positions relative to either naming or registration policies and I'm 
>not aware of any activities there with which you might be "allied".

This was the way I could call for my ISO, ICANN, AFNOR, BSI 
conciliation meeting in Paris (2006/06/08) over the BSI NWIP 
supported by the GAC. This was in the aftermath of the RFC 4646 
consensus I had obtained "against me". It led to the defeat of this 
NWIP (Debbie and Michael only voted for it as UK and EI, with an 
after the limit US support, and a Japan rebuke). I sparked it in 
registering "iso3166.org" and discussing its legitimate ownership 
with the ISO lawyer.

In this case, iana.zone may be a good begining for lawyers. Once IAB 
(and ISOC, if IAB so decides) has addressed the "IFF" question 
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identification_friend_or_foe), it will 
duplicate iana.lib in the "FL" (Free/libre) CLASS supported by the 
multi-MYCANN-Plug-in experimentation" as per ICP-3.

There can also be legal as well as technological test-beds.

jfc