IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> Tue, 23 June 2015 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mueller@syr.edu>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253671A923A for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uikp-DBrLMRa for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.syr.edu (smtp1.syr.edu [128.230.18.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7573F1AC423 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX13-MBX-06.ad.syr.edu (ex13-mbx-06.ad.syr.edu [128.230.108.137]) by smtp1.syr.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t5NHG6oH015296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:16:07 -0400
Received: from EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu (128.230.108.144) by EX13-MBX-06.ad.syr.edu (128.230.108.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:15:59 -0400
Received: from EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu ([128.230.108.144]) by EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu ([128.230.108.144]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.040; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:15:59 -0400
From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
To: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
Thread-Index: AQHQqqenoggMxPgiBEmwD7ntlA4q2p20P26AgAATEACAACPEgIAAFRGAgABM3gCAAA5oAIAAEJcAgAGjMgCAAAWdgIAAnmwAgAAzxICAAAVBgIAA0omAgACEjICAAAStgIAAAUoAgAEXRYCAAERcgIAABM/A
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:15:58 +0000
Message-ID: <afa93173fcf645cba12c127913ff2c3e@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
References: <20150619170708.84611.qmail@ary.lan> <3F18936E1587B5F2BB89E800@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <55847BE9.9040507@gmail.com> <5584BC64.7060403@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506192151170.47260@ary.local> <5584D664.90003@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506201928040.47864@ary.local> <55863ABF.8020903@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211008240.48224@ary.local> <5586EB11.5030404@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211400250.48860@ary.local> <5587A015.9030700@cisco.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506221032250.50421@ary.local> <55881331.9070902@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506221056420.50578@ary.local> <5588FE8B.3040806@gmail.com> <CAKFn1SGxChn3kK=DXApAhpn6y=HB69wOWnYjDPzFmz_QmGUxjg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKFn1SGxChn3kK=DXApAhpn6y=HB69wOWnYjDPzFmz_QmGUxjg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [199.91.193.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-06-23_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1502090000 definitions=main-1506230272
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/CnLtcxAwEKJNekGqrvV_r6gjHIQ>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:16:12 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> > 1. State that the IETF Trust is the most appropriate vehicle to hold
> > the IANA IPR as an asset for the entire Internet community. I think
> > that would be a useful addendum to the IANAPLAN document, but it
> > shouldn't be allowed to hold up the RFC publication.
> 
> The RIR side has suggested this, I can't see many reasons for why we can't
> support that view. It does make sense, maybe except for the names-people
> that so far don't like it for whatever reason.

Let me clarify: the "names community" did not really oppose that view at all. There is really only one member of the CWG who has taken a firm position against it and he unilaterally drafted some text in an appendix that was never vetted by the CWG as a whole. There are several people in the names community who support using the IETF trust (I am one of them).

I personally think it would be helpful if the IETF is able to make its IANAPLAN document state that the IETF Trust is the most appropriate vehicle to hold the IANA IPR.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email