Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Thu, 17 March 2016 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1403412DB8A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSbDMZwRbXjR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9789012D8B4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l124so72468125wmf.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+YL6HsEKuoMSVESHUaUziPN0k/+YSEqHgO/gCjhHo3g=; b=NDD4QB1xXAWsuiylIHSuhQFhDz1BZO121kwPfIp7xNnAkgMveYwpQ9pVQeFY/RxaBW oBDIc+sN5hGTUxPYUs//TdvYUTS0KVyB7SG983VOXfP3nkSWcu/JVihdMKuxrCcLnskF 6O4Aqpf8lo5IwBdlHeZ0YKDXd0a37cM8SsxEWR1bnnVQVRZoC2X4eEgTJ4JBNvJpemLi I3ImHwPNMfdkdoyJNPS5V9akUCNpoLYNCI5FJ76azU2NNACwGkqN/9uLZyngEvw3W1fj yKPJcw0XSrq3vtHYIyCyZAakmJt/mJpZ3X+4tSEWxo0wCQFJnqgOCxuU54k3T80YYmtL vLuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+YL6HsEKuoMSVESHUaUziPN0k/+YSEqHgO/gCjhHo3g=; b=IeM1+MedaPaLS1TIrZytStmCqvi9FKlU5bFO0aQeWGF8ZnotsybmtgfdQ7IxdTIn5s 47HneGRKZkHRyvPGr+CDQqPnV8u+C6dy3DP+Ey3M6YrPQ4QSiGVLmYuEHqnJz1sWXToC 4Pvx9/zI1UtFZzZAMaUn7T5U9AMiyBYE51MddakUvsA8KtOAirCc183xXNE3nMRpB+vq dibleLH09FNxGb48yA45AhUqkEqcZCyxagEWislT3ZJOKdJh58ogwjR09zbPw3JieZHX 4Ki9JHnR5lD8YoqpCfYUiMYnsmD6z9RqYZzflmxsS0oSFl+SsF/zpuUNhn31BnZq0Od1 2bQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK/Xls8+5ohdBSDx7uY4g17tisnUQWoY/K1a2yGfp57uLAsHznhiwF5QKfLPNW6tQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.188.5 with SMTP id m5mr32714623wmf.35.1458195832999; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.136] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w125sm6528048wmw.18.2016.03.16.23.23.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15)
In-Reply-To: <56E9D4EB.6030601@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:23:50 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6ECFEDCE-7588-480A-8E42-DD2B19023759@mnt.se>
References: <20160313143521.GC26841@Hirasawa> <m2a8m0y72q.wl%randy@psg.com> <F04B3B85-6B14-43BA-9A21-FC0A31E79065@piuha.net> <56E7E09D.7040100@cisco.com> <4349AFDD-350C-4217-9BEE-3DBD2F608F95@nohats.ca> <27177.1458050662@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <m2k2l3qud5.wl%randy@psg.com> <56E90304.3050407@cisco.com> <m2bn6eq59r.wl%randy@psg.com> <56E904A7.80200@cisco.com> <m2a8lyq4ud.wl%randy@psg.com> <56E90BF9.4090306@cisco.com> <56E9AC23.8060109@nostrum.com> <56E9B436.2090203@cisco.com> <56E9B543.9080000@nostrum.com> <56E9B5FF.1080301@cisco.com> <56E9B836.9080601@nostrum.com> <56E9C0CA.7040006@comcast.net> <56E9C258.7000108@nostrum.com> <56E9C6DE.6010807@comcast.net> <56E9D4EB.6030601@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Q-2FfKHhC-cgEhcYgeWjKH54Vjg>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:24:00 -0000


Skickat från min iPhone

> 16 mars 2016 kl. 22:49 skrev Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>:
> 
> 
> Mike,
> 
>> On 16/03/16 20:49, Michael StJohns wrote:
>> 
>> Fair enough - so you're asking me to take it on faith that there is a
>> real problem and that it effects sufficient numbers of folks that the
>> IETF should spend *its* money and effort to fix? 
> 
> Did you miss the mail upthread where it was pointed out that
> removing the restriction is a simple checkbox which I assume
> costs no more money than we're giving CF already?
> 
> If we allow Tor access and that turns out to be a source of
> problems, then I do think we ought re-evaluate, but I don't
> think there's any cost here to the IETF to turn off the
> restriction.
> 
> And to clarify another thing: this is not only about the captcha,
> in testing today using TBB sometimes one gets access, sometimes
> one gets a captcha and sometimes access is denied with no captca.
> It seems to depend on the exit node IP.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 

Sorry Stephen - coming up with rational & simple proposals has already been ruled OT in this thread.