IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ietf.org end-to-end principle

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 17 March 2016 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0339312D8E8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WZ5rDm8Ethbc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6946912D8DB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33007BE58; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:38:05 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uW0_L3gIFiy0; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:38:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.49.100] (unknown [86.42.16.188]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65CFDBE4C; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:38:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1458211081; bh=fp/m2/JN6zsd6cis5l5Js1RPmU1/58wlIjVQkPiKKcY=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZwY5Y2BBOW6O8e6q6vPiVk7USruTo/vmxvYJiu4nTUYnAUkjtCn3jd6iR9wW/9OKF y9Dtvt9KzZtOh4k/VC/f3d/rlYlVQwEQ/0/HvZb+LFDH6rWawIzme+7p6Iiaggb+lN zZfB1EBX9to4P0FeK8/GqHSeD+9vTqCS7zV33gBI=
Subject: Re: ietf.org end-to-end principle
To: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <56E90BF9.4090306@cisco.com> <871189680.1322359.1458113811142.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CAHw9_i+yFhJVYvcMLSEgkOkqJjZBsQicCQsi13SaoVQuzxqc8g@mail.gmail.com> <5D6893D1-D61C-490C-91EF-CA5E5C1F484A@piuha.net> <56EA63E3.2070602@restena.lu> <VI1PR07MB15815DEAB1939141F0DCCCF3BC8B0@VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <56EA82FC.5050400@restena.lu> <6D32668528F93D449A073F45707153D8BEC8C8FA@US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <50BC4E4E-822F-4E2F-8F0F-ABE48A5E49E8@telefonica.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56EA8908.5050109@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:38:00 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50BC4E4E-822F-4E2F-8F0F-ABE48A5E49E8@telefonica.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010902020102050104080905"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cVa1ibZmM5Q3AfrTOSrA9bPgd8g>
Cc: Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett@jisc.ac.uk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:38:08 -0000


On 17/03/16 10:31, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA wrote:
>  whether the good-ole e2e principle is no longer applicable

I always think of it as the end to end argument, not principle,
and from that perspective, I think it remains entirely applicable.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email