Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 15 March 2016 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7984412D874 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgTcYNEiljGT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F4A12D76D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 191 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2016 14:59:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 15 Mar 2016 14:59:47 -0000
Date: 15 Mar 2016 14:59:25 -0000
Message-ID: <20160315145925.19031.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
In-Reply-To: <m2shzrrfag.wl%randy@psg.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/r4VC8KojyAd7GbkqveRm1dh77xI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:59:55 -0000

>   cloudflare breaking what should be end to end encryption opens the
>   user to a mitm.  no, i am not saying cloudflare are bad folk.  but,
>   for example, 
>     o they could be served with a fisa order to see my traffic
>     o they could be served with a fisa order to serve subtly different
>       documents to queries from <name your favorite regime>
>     o and all the other problems of having monkeys in the middle

AMS could be served with exactly the same orders.  I don't understand
what point you're making here, unless you want to move the entire IETF
infrastructure to some country with different access laws.

R's,
John