Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Tue, 15 March 2016 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9BF12DC9F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnsZFiw1WPCw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A3D12D740 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l68so41766442wml.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mj+ll3ZGJtocmPc5IBalNG/fclHTLzEO+v24YGAKEJ4=; b=L/83DxJeHVXSpud8cCmkiU4QCZQy804DOoGNhlqfQK5GqND8xOgk/D5ecwiuYbBWJD YVzIMhkwFJCE7wthvb8dRRMTSFraWL55ZxFU2PEX4TybJAYXs7LBLJGXBiFG7WesN4sv 5GgnyYIiFZnTy1mEkCLN6NgGDlKLlduGyJEad0sAf4p7HlH0gQd4EmamK5vTbcAtaarJ 2CcumaLYyP+zStaBkJphoKInnM5Xpy87M4BINSiDduFtLyNasSxAb/Pes59rebVi7OQV urVI3TnHDEkXoJmKm8cPLaSeHMFvj7a5WXMqWHCn3VZDLV03i18XxvqH4ylyHanXmMX7 ZdPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mj+ll3ZGJtocmPc5IBalNG/fclHTLzEO+v24YGAKEJ4=; b=iHpgLNSWrT+A57YaTaq7nPEO/OapComChIZ8PiyBG/ywDsHEXkJDoXYP5flO3pDeLH CAYiUNt59Caz0vj4jB/VefOXdDn1OoqkmB7oZDizFjuYN+VCPoGI9UXMud6+kiQtMX7L df7wPK3GVmExwrrf3+oJ86qKLA5GUv8cZ+nyDneyDciN4FCASKyn9avx5Dsn+DQIhVAG 4UKo1f5NKICIKow0ZoyuxJQhdvb88v9hexe111JY08PZZMeKa34m5RPSiqYqnIzkdISv udt/7l65UFVvJIFTnfqtzdWICwJ7MuNmfEDf8bL9V1BadwR8KwIbFeZW6VMqp4ZR0ah+ Txjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLcX/NNODghqghGtXRwPYNJA6QDdO53YtK4KYY82UJmksCKAf2J4ivHivdwI7kmMg==
X-Received: by 10.28.104.131 with SMTP id d125mr24138201wmc.99.1458070591081; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.136] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c144sm22264864wmd.12.2016.03.15.12.36.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15)
In-Reply-To: <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845754B70B@newserver.arneill-py.local>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:36:29 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <95B61DEA-C4BE-407B-95E3-33A058F7D3C7@mnt.se>
References: <m2a8m0y72q.wl%randy@psg.com> <20160315002604.15726.qmail@ary.lan> <CACRMD1Gp_3xjanC+YXLrwo9FMcDay1JQ6YPtAS1tTqk+C_AUVg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603150755160.47203@ary.lan> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845754B682@newserver.arneill-py.local> <84804F38-6F04-4EFE-A735-81EB5AE0B35C@mnt.se> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845754B70B@newserver.arneill-py.local>
To: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VgRkXYoBzR_rPkbGmk7atkm4VE0>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:36:45 -0000


Skickat från min iPhone

15 mars 2016 kl. 18:55 skrev Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>us>:

>>> Michel Py wrote :
>>> I would not go as far as saying "most of the traffic" (as it implies some
>>> volume) but "most of the exit nodes are engaged in some malicious activity".
>> Leif Johansson wrote :
>> Thats true to the same extent  that "the Internet is mostly about cat videos"
> 
> That is true to the extent that I counted myself several times and the last time I counted (this year) out of the known 1827 Tor exit nodes, 896 were marked as having "malicious" activities; it goes over the half mark on a regular basis. This data is not public (yet) but it will be soon, it's not based on Cloudflare data. I'm not the only one who has observed it either; there are reasons why both attack mitigation solution providers and end-networks filter and/or block Tor.
> 
> This is not guesswork.
> 
> Michel.

My point was that sometimes the good outweigh the bad anyway.
>