Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 15 March 2016 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC3512D8BC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MD-yVz56G4yI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2420C12D700 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id l68so11085320wml.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kMIM43dJCHsrdCtP+jHe173Axz/MR44p9iPuOvtjHEg=; b=PR8+SqaV2cRzqELq2OZaf50+2Ywnn+MKeYesDMv34wiWLTp3evN0aKx8yln1aQOkb0 RXRVd0ffHb4BTTFNkrj7OM9VY3tH/vnI4WAWnlhogSc6ST2MW+E4YNHqnQiaGhh7kFJp E5rRozvONffsUmmKLKn8kvELhCxMeTmKI9af+KKct2f9+vxh5XgTtUtVgkmHJhGdZc02 y7DjQ+mf2ZxG40Qtjxl4Uip2Ua9SlK1eSrwA9s7mu8O2WbcTM9MNM5tN2ljzlfC2wsrx w3ggrgv2euO1Ga2MIW2PdFWIsZ4zywXX4jjFsYF5lHFIIaa3l34v/D1LQL9nhHWEbtqf oqTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kMIM43dJCHsrdCtP+jHe173Axz/MR44p9iPuOvtjHEg=; b=TbGrPYFo0unTb76qUU6h+vCrx2QQTRHyUct/f/oi3X3l6Dkf1C3NGF6rpDNuKkN6TE /DsE7EBnHVcsV+chCj3KSmYRGtNWSCyEIU45m7tUlUNM/yk59D+NVifiFwRzompajcUn f/iOaP0ZYTE7qMMA8INhlIemzj+tN8Ds/tVs1uiys57hgQiQ/Wakh7bSOlRkC5Av0zqR Wac1uh53Md4DloU7yWjaOKmQXO4Bc0RCLhw3kweE55+1KKGUp+V9FBpk6Gzly0CM7KbL od3LMLfIHOhKsG/LQmeB1YMAjOKLumK1bAORUAKlK8syfIsh8l3hKDBN5fJIF6nZOzg6 +Pyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKBz4+bOLxWpIDUoNxnVMtBHAfvNs7xELarZ2qzOp/9xC5+vlpFF0zemYhsoT4d4g==
X-Received: by 10.194.202.195 with SMTP id kk3mr27564407wjc.159.1458022644314; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yoavs-mbp-2.mshome.net ([176.13.3.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n66sm19377681wmg.20.2016.03.14.23.17.22 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160315002604.15726.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:17:06 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6B4EF3D9-2F8F-43C1-AC24-EFEBAAEF8A53@gmail.com>
References: <20160315002604.15726.qmail@ary.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eWyOvJgvUO2eF6QrLnOIjZ0e7Ow>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:17:29 -0000

On 15 Mar 2016, at 2:26 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> 
> Cloudflare provides DDoS protection along with the load spreading.  For
> the second question, I've seen a lot of CDNs and can't think of one that
> does a good job with TLS certificates.

Maybe we should have a BoF to address this.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk