Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

I have concluded two things.

1. Most people have completely failed to understand the meaning of "adoption" in the IETF WG context. I and at least one co-author will be submitting a draft about that to the gendispatch WG soon.

2. When I hear a choir singing, it is the same as hearing one voice.

My personal decision at this point is to delete all messages about CRH adoption unread, except for the message we will soon receive from the WG Chairs stating the rough consensus of the adoption call, which ends on 2020-05-29. I do feel sympathy for the Chairs who must read and evaluate everything.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 28-May-20 23:23, Mark Smith wrote:
> I've been an active participant in the ipng, 6man and v6ops IETF working groups since 2002. 
> 
> While I've only been to one IETF meeting in person since then (106, sponsored by the Internet Society), over that time I've come to recognise the names of many of the regular and active participants in these IPv6 working groups.
> 
> I do not recognise many of the names of people who are objecting to the 6man working group adopting the CRH draft.
> 
> Those who have been active 6man participants in recent years would know that even an ID adopted by 6man, written by Bob and Brian, that had a number of revisions, didn't survive WG last call, and that occurred while Bob was (as he still is) one of the 6man WG chairs.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Mark.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>