Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft

[Stefan Hakansson LK <[e-mail]>]

On 04/27/2012 06:43 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
> Ted Hardie wrote:
>> The chairs would like to ask the working group to focus on the use
>> case draft.  If you have use cases that need to be added to the
>> document or text changes you'd like to suggest, please send them in
>
> I proposed the following use-case back in February, but there wasn't
> much discussion on actually adding it to the document:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg03357.html
>
> Let me know if the WG would like to proceed with something like this.

I think adding another small derivative of the simple video chat (this 
one with peer-to-peer file transfer added) makes a lot of sense. For 
one, we get a use case that requires reliable data (now we only have a 
req for "short latency datagram" which sound like unreliable to me); in 
addition we get a requirement for the data channel API to be able to use 
blobs (as defined in the File API W3C rec) as input/output.

A third good requirement that can be derived (if we want to) is the 
ability to prioritize data in relation to audio/video.

So, I think we should add it.

Stefan

> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb