Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoints [was RE: Use Case draft]

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 04 May 2012 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F02D21F863D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8P95zQRPtCm for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6B621F85A5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so2325053vbb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 May 2012 04:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=N5FsxrQwCJ4Pq5r6Q2lYeS4YI/rawGmg/WISooQ8PnU=; b=SJ/2hYd5Q1Nwdvh9kO8pq+BF1nPaYEbNVesjlF81Ij4WkJk7f+t5jP2qElc0sZG9ZW JZep7m7/TJhWIUtPv0yqDmq5QNvPOfJ/uuYo3INQfoWo4drgwa5qaupx5IWbGN1GNku+ He9fhjdw3ugwvamm5Q/oxMgDwCtkLzv6HrNhs232Wf0z/gs2EMsFZZlhgcS4d+sWIKYm j/vXTOqxYtiaSwDvCoNIQRnoxpQFrOSi0Ke4NKaELC5gRVOlems/rVJmfwEEPXduYZnj 5eDOqn7lVmdhgvg0Wu/8wp6ya13qRQMqETU28NC+pVhNZk60AP8aPHeXH8OixVEIvo65 LNYw==
Received: by 10.52.93.131 with SMTP id cu3mr2774850vdb.122.1336130256550; Fri, 04 May 2012 04:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.107.199 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <326D1E5B-2B52-4CB4-A13C-40AC0A1D4A5A@belltower.co.uk>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F066@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <BLU169-W7C59E1EDB4CB06B648577932B0@phx.gbl> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E23AFFF@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <2E496AC9-63A0-464A-A628-7407ED8DD9C4@phonefromhere.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E23B16B@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <E2714FBC-D06B-4A12-9E07-C49EBF55084C@phonefromhere.com> <4F9EC0B2.10903@alcatel-lucent.com> <101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E31299282765@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <CAJNg7VKENERKAFA-n5KeoeBNmGgHrnzDOU0BzC9+fSdsuGwdEw@mail.gmail.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F24F@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <4FA0F43E.4020308@ericsson.com> <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F336@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <013101cd288c$09328250$1b9786f0$@com> <CALiegf=RsHHf9jCBhE55t7qFUpts8yJ1c8qUX12nc_vd4vgjSQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJNg7VLCGgJGpV1+YTdBGjMOLBj4x=2-xyu8bpcjRt8Riyo6hA@mail.gmail.com> <326D1E5B-2B52-4CB4-A13C-40AC0A1D4A5A@belltower.co.uk>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:17:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfmaUyvJnwWJTmq7sR+-ZuowyLo==gZNQWzi1LUAQvNqow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Neil Stratford <neils@belltower.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsVrU4hFQrEErkiff1OjSlqoKTV51T5uAVUIZvlZnc+trf9dx7mo45j55Zc3BgnvnluVuA
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoints [was RE: Use Case draft]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:24:17 -0000

2012/5/4 Neil Stratford <neils@belltower.co.uk>:
> There is no reason that the RTP to SRTP/ICE gateway needs to be hosted
> server side, it could equally be a software component downloaded to each
> client machine running a WebRTC browser.
>
> In fact, you could even do it in a Java Applet that's sole purpose is to
> relay RTP to SRTP and perform ICE with the local WebRTC stack.
>
> No, actually, forget I said that.

No no no, you said that, you said that !!!
I cannot forget it, it's the most painful concept I've ever read !!! XDDD

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>