Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping.

Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> Tue, 01 May 2012 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E9B21E808F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgXcLtHu8iVM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C5C21E808E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so2825032lag.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2LGnp4PDB2qclAt6KxDV5muQ/inG9LLjU+1E9OjXKa0=; b=nEz3Vf2wG/vIoV32pDKIY3+s0AjiIQyXOUw+s8VIF0mFJ66nwGPa3ZcLDDb/MJ59Vx xE3PN8PEaTQq8HGjC4LfcHQ1sGmfb2qcm75VybEQcBEFXZEMsKZBPpbQ4tZoFuIMgmje Dit+Sx1g8ED0EMg3Mg3p+Q6BQllKB6GDVhRRHo8IcVUt6riUfs1AhCDNCiUubIV+Tviw R4Z/XGeZ+tqpkUh4jyBQjriGLPoNijWmg5UJK+UppdOXyMPSyvX825u+WkySArJh9qmL MDwfViXvDU/CLdT4Ty2QDwg5cRUTZR0XALMtbJUd2NmkC3VrDh14HeFrSf04uIc6sJSp Q0GQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.111.41 with SMTP id if9mr23284533lab.19.1335882917492; Tue, 01 May 2012 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.56.13 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E36D1A4AE0B6AA4091F1728D584A6AD2174ECCB2@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com> <101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E312992828BD@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <E36D1A4AE0B6AA4091F1728D584A6AD2174ECCB2@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:35:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJNg7V+ty3ZmyLNJDBFKbuGaDq4OvtSUOzw5S_1EBJzKYFxWbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
To: "Cavigioli, Chris" <chris.cavigioli@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping.
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:35:20 -0000

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Cavigioli, Chris
<chris.cavigioli@intel.com> wrote:
> Wording needs to be clarified.
> - "Eavesdropping" has a negative connotation of someone inappropriately listening in to another communication.  This should not happen.
> - "Lawful intercept" is something telecom service providers are required to provide to law enforcement with all appropriate safeguards in place http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawful_interception

Lawful intercept is a legal term, which in my opinion the IETF should
stay away from.  You will go into the weeds amazing fast otherwise.

I prefer "monitoring," which can be done for many reasons (see the
parallel discussion on enterprise call centers).

Regards
Marshall

> -chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hutton, Andrew
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 6:14 AM
> To: Ted Hardie; rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping.
>
> Hi,
>
> A number of use cases within Draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-07 contain the statement "It is essential that the communication cannot be eavesdropped" however there is no definition of what is actually meant by "eavesdropped" although I think we all have an idea of what it means.
>
> Maybe it would be better to replace these statements with something that refers to wiretapping and RFC 2804 (RAVEN) which actually has a definition of wiretapping.
>
> Regards
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Ted Hardie
>> Sent: 27 April 2012 17:15
>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
>>
>> The chairs would like to ask the working group to focus on the use
>> case draft.  If you have use cases that need to be added to the
>> document or text changes you'd like to suggest, please send them in
>> for discussion before May 15th.  After this round, we will look toward
>> having a working group last call on the document (hopefully before the
>> interim meeting).
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Ted, Magnus, Cullen
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb