Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping.
Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> Tue, 01 May 2012 14:35 UTC
Return-Path: <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E9B21E808F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgXcLtHu8iVM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C5C21E808E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so2825032lag.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2LGnp4PDB2qclAt6KxDV5muQ/inG9LLjU+1E9OjXKa0=; b=nEz3Vf2wG/vIoV32pDKIY3+s0AjiIQyXOUw+s8VIF0mFJ66nwGPa3ZcLDDb/MJ59Vx xE3PN8PEaTQq8HGjC4LfcHQ1sGmfb2qcm75VybEQcBEFXZEMsKZBPpbQ4tZoFuIMgmje Dit+Sx1g8ED0EMg3Mg3p+Q6BQllKB6GDVhRRHo8IcVUt6riUfs1AhCDNCiUubIV+Tviw R4Z/XGeZ+tqpkUh4jyBQjriGLPoNijWmg5UJK+UppdOXyMPSyvX825u+WkySArJh9qmL MDwfViXvDU/CLdT4Ty2QDwg5cRUTZR0XALMtbJUd2NmkC3VrDh14HeFrSf04uIc6sJSp Q0GQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.111.41 with SMTP id if9mr23284533lab.19.1335882917492; Tue, 01 May 2012 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.56.13 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E36D1A4AE0B6AA4091F1728D584A6AD2174ECCB2@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com> <101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E312992828BD@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <E36D1A4AE0B6AA4091F1728D584A6AD2174ECCB2@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:35:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJNg7V+ty3ZmyLNJDBFKbuGaDq4OvtSUOzw5S_1EBJzKYFxWbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
To: "Cavigioli, Chris" <chris.cavigioli@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping.
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:35:20 -0000
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Cavigioli, Chris <chris.cavigioli@intel.com> wrote: > Wording needs to be clarified. > - "Eavesdropping" has a negative connotation of someone inappropriately listening in to another communication. This should not happen. > - "Lawful intercept" is something telecom service providers are required to provide to law enforcement with all appropriate safeguards in place http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawful_interception Lawful intercept is a legal term, which in my opinion the IETF should stay away from. You will go into the weeds amazing fast otherwise. I prefer "monitoring," which can be done for many reasons (see the parallel discussion on enterprise call centers). Regards Marshall > -chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hutton, Andrew > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 6:14 AM > To: Ted Hardie; rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. > > Hi, > > A number of use cases within Draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-07 contain the statement "It is essential that the communication cannot be eavesdropped" however there is no definition of what is actually meant by "eavesdropped" although I think we all have an idea of what it means. > > Maybe it would be better to replace these statements with something that refers to wiretapping and RFC 2804 (RAVEN) which actually has a definition of wiretapping. > > Regards > Andy > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On >> Behalf Of Ted Hardie >> Sent: 27 April 2012 17:15 >> To: rtcweb@ietf.org >> Subject: [rtcweb] Use Case draft >> >> The chairs would like to ask the working group to focus on the use >> case draft. If you have use cases that need to be added to the >> document or text changes you'd like to suggest, please send them in >> for discussion before May 15th. After this round, we will look toward >> having a working group last call on the document (hopefully before the >> interim meeting). >> >> regards, >> >> Ted, Magnus, Cullen >> _______________________________________________ >> rtcweb mailing list >> rtcweb@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Timothy B. Terriberry
- [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Igor Faynberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Cavigioli, Chris
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Igor Faynberg
- [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoints [… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integrity … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integr… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integr… Harald Alvestrand