Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft

Wording needs to be clarified.
- "Eavesdropping" has a negative connotation of someone inappropriately listening in to another communication.  This should not happen.
- "Lawful intercept" is something telecom service providers are required to provide to law enforcement with all appropriate safeguards in place http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawful_interception 
-chris

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hutton, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 6:14 AM
To: Ted Hardie; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping.

Hi,

A number of use cases within Draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-07 contain the statement "It is essential that the communication cannot be eavesdropped" however there is no definition of what is actually meant by "eavesdropped" although I think we all have an idea of what it means.

Maybe it would be better to replace these statements with something that refers to wiretapping and RFC 2804 (RAVEN) which actually has a definition of wiretapping.

Regards
Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Ted Hardie
> Sent: 27 April 2012 17:15
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
> 
> The chairs would like to ask the working group to focus on the use
> case draft.  If you have use cases that need to be added to the
> document or text changes you'd like to suggest, please send them in
> for discussion before May 15th.  After this round, we will look toward
> having a working group last call on the document (hopefully before the
> interim meeting).
> 
> regards,
> 
> Ted, Magnus, Cullen
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb