IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Expiry Doctrine (Re: Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org])

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 13 September 2020 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27ABE3A0BEB for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQvW-Czxf9Xg for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489183A0BEA for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599992653; bh=E2i9RSSfWrPMdhgT4eI9Af+UeGWFfGNt2OIc+zK2Iz0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=V6vG2gNkqRDrrwFbJTVvR/HEwpQ7HknxGnnf3/f0evm/YbfgKqJpgq/VjA+oO1/lo PcRNq5OonLICL3jHgxnzQWR4QouSlHPLKOOnkyzo7IHwLth+3FgkaMT9OeUAZ0MaJp ywtTN0PzaOMrn5kAhz2c7BFVg08aEg8OsdFC8mJ8=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.57.159]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQ5rO-1jvJvQ3TSi-00M78k for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:12 +0200
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <8657.1599751932@localhost> <84c8d593-c7b6-4327-338f-9b2b0e7a36e0@levkowetz.com> <0C6D4DE2-F9F3-4C7C-8427-264F34C8C2B7@tzi.org> <26d795d2-3761-2950-4346-62f849d86eed@nostrum.com> <7792.1599768579@localhost> <C73D6AB9-694E-458E-AEEE-45DBDEF623C5@vigilsec.com> <3B281EED-CDCE-4025-8C78-7BA689490936@tzi.org> <5B0C691F-EA59-44E9-959F-52445CA58314@gmail.com> <41EEFFCD-DEB9-4950-95B1-F43ACC73CAF1@vigilsec.com> <2F82E43A-39CF-4C99-BE9E-CD84D2BE21B3@gmail.com> <C44C644D-C24A-4839-BB61-F758AA2D7BF1@vigilsec.com> <BCB7C223-EFDE-46D3-A4E2-82068C688547@tzi.org> <16c77153-dd60-c241-1666-b3a9ab9d4e62@nostrum.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <c2955e75-8b82-c783-492d-1a1d31127bf4@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <16c77153-dd60-c241-1666-b3a9ab9d4e62@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:CL4fue2SA7tO/SqaimxYsog3QV3yidWl31NB05J717GHJE1hljh f62sjV/1OSYLBbjQYDjM1QlCr+XKU+WOnpc/domC1nda07eEf4CRombf14EcgX1/cqmicTV 7U9eNNQF6dy9/SPxr/NW+geL6iZl0tS3d5ectHtHXM4GGxXcr8tqaMSb1ocAFtGwk7yBWSx sflWmi7HICKb4jSi7d9WQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:7sdKeoJxiO0=:bDzq08Oa0bYfkHJhFyqUtY +onkKhBXTwk/hAtsKWaYkuZeKeCVjNjvrhNAw9Nv4UjMItxphebmMsF2xCCBK44Z13ATJa4PX yKjnFeWorKRiscRkb8S/iYOwXhSbotdF3jFByBNs9cwc/tm0GGVqa5chfH7/s12TSehuVew01 6p2M80JLd0LxGA0xhVQyDyJegUw+LklLpMJumaWElYoZiPGs1SbkG8jtOHaDp/o2zxRXS77a7 WFFHa2KuXc97s5eiaFJZ+PatlyRsJ2s9bO0h8fLEX29oJ4Lj/xoI6+aE1GYNrveAxmlVc6wKJ gdjp9Q0iaFF2FmV8el11+8EpgyxifMXMBqFJYTcdHB78LSGJXNKSYn6m0iGdmRQ07xki3Ir2h 2gQcnKuQ5+tR6vIH8Aajxik1KgiuzNONfb2TI6uVpsIN3hREj+HBC0Xtx3TQUzorqqyDCP112 eshdwDGzXVpqSbC6xkHAWPbnbDgyIRAVk/Uw47wajJcjasqxurk4LDeB6sBywsT+EDMtQ9azi Hwhc1GurO5JR5pEZuoPmmcQ6PoLW4Ii6dnNbjY9wOmOTef2y6QrBUJJsC9lFtj0wV3kAStbZn IDeJplcX37mMYtFo2fhJaO3oNwrq22e81yMxgZVKJQ0pfnnwLImi5xjdpxKmvRAx5nn2FGv+l 0SnIaASd+hy36QsNS4Ou4eeKbP5Ty6+sb7rKO05egVp2TkXosmHJ1WaDCC8+/GutWb065oc2+ YFC38i7DD6FiBSyH3PAGzPGRZqjZfvFA+vK+DE3N8E9Nuab2qcCK0IMTuBMb8xiX6vpf4QvDT UFfDm4WaNkZB4kgBynEn5pLxvgdOoQ1zuUR5SbJn4p/4/lSzr5wLwJSfsP+4nTK2AuQ5BzMcz eTrQtGB554ruHwFMX9y6ezSF4v8ZYC4konlnvjaoYLsT/GlWYeG81rtqjk3zaRx0koofci9zy bkSe1MTaFtj6wnOSU2GJyATXdswUpAf9k5ASRK3KO8iDLdt5cDvXZ0q0khStPSsK2NRrPHQip CkgxbsFjlIwswbts9YzNdabgmE/eni29lygq0MuFDI6AA1jIN3c8DgRNxeudw1YgO2JegL7Wd 63lCeNLZh1lhXezlJeBOlI//vhDOpa6uA5GpXwgG/gT+qTdrFLsMNV7ggMVOK6CXvJdH6a/3j CXuuZhThZvGncEBvwpoRUM+Kqwd3rZ9KtISkpEQQrW2HPMZxLG0gKeSa2sI/Z/e8azj9CDUAz Jt7gqxY/oGGuvJyAFtGs9WtcQrn/AlHDzquz8Pw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/rsu6ieMB11QPJg8xi43kJAtMT8c>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Expiry Doctrine (Re: Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org])
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 10:24:17 -0000

Am 12.09.2020 um 18:57 schrieb Robert Sparks:
> One minor, but I think important, tweak to your commentary.
>
> On 9/12/20 3:31 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> On 2020-09-11, at 20:59, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>>> I disagree.  If the I-D has expired, it should not be shown there.
>> A little Saturday metacomment:
>>
>> This is a nice example of “process confabulation”, designing software
>> for what SHOULD happen, not for what actually DOES (and NEEDS TO) happen.
>>
>> Our discussion of Internet-Drafts is dominated by what I’ll call the
>> “Expiry Doctrine” — Internet-Drafts expire and then no longer exist.
>> Since this doctrine is obviously unworkable per se, we patch it up by
>> providing a separate archive of expired drafts.
> The archive is _all_ drafts, not just expired ones - the active ones are
> there too. It is the stable thing you are asking for already. The
> question I'm hearing is do we point more things at that by default.
> ...

Actually, the archive is all the draftf that have been submitted as v3
XML. So generic code can't decide what to link to without inspecting the
link target first.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email