IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Kossut Tomasz - Hurt <Tomasz.Kossut@orange.com> Mon, 25 August 2014 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Tomasz.Kossut@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1521A8960 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.186
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wg6Lw8duaM-y for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailin.tpsa.pl (mailout.tpsa.pl [212.160.172.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B9541A8954 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10.236.62.154 (EHLO OPE10HT06.tp.gk.corp.tepenet) ([10.236.62.154]) by mailin.tpsa.pl (MOS 4.4.2a-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CJS41150; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:58:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kossut Tomasz - Hurt <Tomasz.Kossut@orange.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment
Thread-Index: AQHPswOAKp4cYlfWs0iK+WcgE96R8pvGrYlQgBq87TA=
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:57:29 +0000
Message-ID: <A0BB7AD89EA705449C486BDB5FDCBC7B0EE766BC@OPE10MB06.tp.gk.corp.tepenet>
References: <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <4F7D76F6-BD81-453B-94DC-A3C3DFF68505@delong.com> <8600C096-37D0-4651-92C1-BCFDBA674433@nominum.com> <CAD6AjGTBfyT-zNDJtBKCNtRxd=Hi07678Sr_-HgSGYbjAiF3Tg@mail.gmail.com> <C5281716-DC04-42E6-AC82-0D53E5DA0284@nominum.com> <53E1236A.605@fud.no> <m1XEkJJ-0000BuC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20140805195402.GO51793@Space.Net> <m1XElwg-0000BbC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <D00834AF.68B6C%Lee@asgard.org> <CAD6AjGQJ3PXpGkk9Cd4d-MhExZ9QrpiseyAqPqmpXzQ-HCyDwQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2=dMg6sua+9v28t173TQVYet6pDU7Xv6RWkbGjqA1ziA@mail.gmail.com> <D00A8AFF.26D18%evyncke@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US
Content-Language: pl-PL
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A0BB7AD89EA705449C486BDB5FDCBC7B0EE766BCOPE10MB06tpgkco_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50, refid=2.7.2:2014.8.25.125725:17:8.510, ip=, rules=__HAS_FROM, FROM_NAME_PHRASE, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __IMS_MSGID, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __MIME_VERSION, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, ECARD_KNOWN_DOMAINS, __STOCK_PHRASE_7, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, SUPERLONG_LINE, __HTML_FONT_BLUE, __HAS_HTML, BODY_SIZE_10000_PLUS, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __STYLE_RATWARE_NEG, __URI_NS, HTML_70_90, MULTIPLE_RCPTS
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mailin.tpsa.pl
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0C0208.53FB40FA.0218, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2012-12-31 09:39:00, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0C0208.53FB40FA.0218, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2012-12-31 09:39:00, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3b4cc769aff48891f03de6b30b037e7c
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/2_6Bm3-3OKjnD_Flb7RwCwxlixw
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:58:27 -0000

HI,
Ipv6 traffic for OPL Ipv6 mobile subscribers returns to its "normal" values.
Native Ipv6=60%,NAT64=40%*

*- mainly national content, If polish national top 10 Alexa content becomes Ipv6 then 90% traffic will be Ipv6...
So if you now IPv6 readiness for your national top Alexa sites you can estimate how much NAT64 you can expect.

Regards,
TK


From: Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 4:19 PM
To: 'Eric Vyncke (evyncke)'; Lorenzo Colitti
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG
Subject: RE: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Hi,
Internet traffic for OPL ipv6 -464xlat users (3G/4G)
Traffic till mid-July:
Ipv6 -60% (78% to Google)
Nat64 -40%
Traffic from mid-July up to now:
Ipv6 - 40%* (50% to Google)
Nat64- 60%

*On W28 we noticed abnormal drop of AAAA queries generated by users. It looks like some DS servers becomes Ipv4 only, or web browser ipv4 fallback takes place more often.. (we analyzing data)

Regards,
Tomasz

From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) [mailto:evyncke@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 2:12 PM
To: Lorenzo Colitti
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Lorenzo

For my education, do you have a pointer for a data point on:

From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com>>
A 4G handset with 464xlat will have ~50% of traffic native IPv6, ~45% NAT64, and ~5% 464xlat. 464 conversion is lossy and brittle, but if it's only used for 5% of traffic, then the operator might just say, "Who cares? I don't; and if somebody else does, they're free to use IPv6."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email