Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt

Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net> Thu, 07 August 2014 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ross@eircom.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614F11B2B1A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKV9lr8OwxIq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 609E81B2B20 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25385 messnum 3163334 invoked from network[213.94.190.11/avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 7 Aug 2014 13:35:39 -0000
Received: from avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (213.94.190.11) by mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 25385) with SMTP; 7 Aug 2014 13:35:39 -0000
Received: from mac1.home.ross.net ([159.134.196.35]) by avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net with Cloudmark Gateway id bpbb1o00m0mJ9Tz01pbf7j; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:35:39 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_156F181D-0E26-40FA-A440-458069E6D198"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <f6347a8cb7cf49f19bc994efc6b66a25@BLUPR04MB596.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:35:34 +0100
Message-Id: <B650CA16-AB89-41B1-8DEC-BBB782B21E64@eircom.net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408060856080.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se> <53E1D951.8030200@fud.no> <3f59106bc21840dfb144c7933215294f@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <53E27522.4070901@fud.no> <84A403BD-7E93-4D99-8C11-FB7F91B68154@eircom.net> <0CEE83E4-FA58-4D85-B753-1F218540C624@eircom.net> <53E30E74.7050502@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTjYTzDRC_UbmmwiafAYch-VH=_sOaMWu+tMOQNrcEOCQ@mail.gmail.com> <f6347a8cb7cf49f19bc994efc6b66a25@BLUPR04MB596.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
To: Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/qF1NeScTByHKXTUNCOvRXv54CK0
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:35:45 -0000

On 7 Aug 2014, at 14:16, Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com> wrote:

> When I’m abroad, I always make a point to test all operators on IPv6-only and always see a lot of failure. This becomes especially apparent if the home operator performs some steering of roaming targeted to an operator that doesn’t allow IPv6.
> Dave Michaud

Steering of roaming sounds like a failure mode that should be mentioned in the draft.

BR
Ross