Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt

Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net> Thu, 07 August 2014 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ross@eircom.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761791B2A74 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 04:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxmWdxQTrqJW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 04:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AC0FD1B2A6D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 04:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7344 messnum 3261140 invoked from network[213.94.190.14/avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 7 Aug 2014 11:16:34 -0000
Received: from avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (213.94.190.14) by mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 7344) with SMTP; 7 Aug 2014 11:16:34 -0000
Received: from mac1.home.ross.net ([159.134.196.35]) by avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net with Cloudmark Gateway id bnGX1o00y0mJ9Tz01nGao8; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:16:34 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <AFAB9759B1DE4F4187483FC509B501990119F9006A42@HE111490.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:16:30 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CC30C55B-C811-4087-88C1-EC535E5933ED@eircom.net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <DF75AC0C-098C-4EC8-9598-6F003E1887AA@eircom.net> <CAM+vMERzKa64qyUmmp8j_0e+Sxe4zXdUQwkjrRQe910=Rz+==A@mail.gmail.com> <3B143C5A-875A-4E6F-B34A-A354758E1893@eircom.net> <CAM+vMERpZYt3VyWJgp_+GVsMLDj=4rp+MAts5veL2uKCQp_LQg@mail.gmail.com> <3268A775-40CE-4FEA-9B09-846D35376ADD@eircom.net> <AFAB9759B1DE4F4187483FC509B501990119F9006A42@HE111490.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8Tq_30dbBdhzvLhe8UgPZoSmMso
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:16:37 -0000

On 7 Aug 2014, at 11:47, <holger.metschulat@telekom.de> <holger.metschulat@telekom.de> wrote:

> But then, ticking the correct “I am IPv6 capable" and "I am IPv4v6 capable" boxes in the IR.21 database should not be forgotten...

AFAIK the latest version of IR.21 is version 9.1 (05 July 2013)

Relevant sections look like:

Section ID: 16   on Packet Data Services Information

Section ID: 20   on LTE Roaming Information

Both are optional sections, but it is clearly good practise to update them, and seeing entries being made should help encourage other operators to also deploy IPv6.

Ross