IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> Tue, 05 August 2014 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tore@fud.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC151B29FC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 04:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkIN7lo01lVL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 04:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from greed.fud.no (greed.fud.no [IPv6:2a02:c0:1001:100::145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879751B29E6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 04:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a02:c0:2:1:1194:17:0:1000] (port=57782 helo=echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com) by greed.fud.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tore@fud.no>) id 1XEdIW-0006Ai-IA; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:52:56 +0200
Message-ID: <53E0C548.9050706@fud.no>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:51:36 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no>
In-Reply-To: <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/JzJBuOqhWz2gy_MmgaKCBLeNXbQ
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:53:03 -0000

* Tore Anderson

> Eerily good timing... I just started working on this again today, as it
> happens. What I'm looking at now is two drafts, the one that's already
> there for a single-translation network-only implementation, plus another
> one describing an extension very similar to 464XLAT that would allow
> NAT-incompatible and/or IPv4-only applications to be used in an
> otherwise IPv6-only data centre.

Here you go:

http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/toreanderson/ietf/blob/master/siit-dc.html
http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/toreanderson/ietf/blob/master/siit-dc-2xlat.html

XML sources and .txt formats at https://github.com/toreanderson/ietf/.

They're work in progress obviously, I haven't uploaded them to the I-D
repository yet. It would be nice if you and Lee could have a chat with
the sunset4 chairs and agree on which WG is the most appropriate first.
(I have no particular preference, but I want it done Right.)

Comments, criticisms, suggestions, pull requests would be very welcome!

Tore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email