IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0589F1B28FE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id peBaviXYGHth for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781071A037C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f51so5250434qge.25 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UtB8iq36CFANdLWOZjq3xbJ11zKrE9JHF3y/6KO0s5g=; b=A7AmFKIjTbnszAbFLSTVuNmiyckKO/UijJI3pN8UQDyWICsVSGeAsPF7hiYQxwUCWu VGkcMeH9JaxDcwolHkUSAvIttOJWoGb1xRrXVH+KMg8tKxP13L63zgO0fPLt+5NEI5tr bcywfSIovZVxUgcpSSMitw41l3fLS7LkCTxubtzizUuxodF8WoutgZj2CiuQTCbM2KNZ kWG9fQk1bDwEAIQ4WdIJAiMrNCfWvEx4rigxP97ZpUkxCY6tUcAdS/DNQ0AdyK1zcml/ +0zdj9U/Au4o9jMDw80BFgP0bx229IE5vW18GQAdJE8EEzyHNJDeCYEQ6m7Jq0IbJKUr 14Ag==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.31.246 with SMTP id f109mr19550662qgf.8.1407461112736; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.46.10 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CC30C55B-C811-4087-88C1-EC535E5933ED@eircom.net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <DF75AC0C-098C-4EC8-9598-6F003E1887AA@eircom.net> <CAM+vMERzKa64qyUmmp8j_0e+Sxe4zXdUQwkjrRQe910=Rz+==A@mail.gmail.com> <3B143C5A-875A-4E6F-B34A-A354758E1893@eircom.net> <CAM+vMERpZYt3VyWJgp_+GVsMLDj=4rp+MAts5veL2uKCQp_LQg@mail.gmail.com> <3268A775-40CE-4FEA-9B09-846D35376ADD@eircom.net> <AFAB9759B1DE4F4187483FC509B501990119F9006A42@HE111490.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CC30C55B-C811-4087-88C1-EC535E5933ED@eircom.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:25:12 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMETQBdBYwdgSX2w63BgwZdjUJJyOMGaH+SXexM-s-iwQLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: "holger.metschulat" <holger.metschulat@telekom.de>, Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/i_ak10Np-ZU8whO7F7Iowc-a1Jg
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 01:25:15 -0000

2014-08-07 19:16 GMT+08:00, Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>:
>
> On 7 Aug 2014, at 11:47, <holger.metschulat@telekom.de>
> <holger.metschulat@telekom.de> wrote:
>
>> But then, ticking the correct “I am IPv6 capable" and "I am IPv4v6
>> capable" boxes in the IR.21 database should not be forgotten...
>
> AFAIK the latest version of IR.21 is version 9.1 (05 July 2013)
>
> Relevant sections look like:
>
> Section ID: 16   on Packet Data Services Information
>
> Section ID: 20   on LTE Roaming Information
>
> Both are optional sections, but it is clearly good practise to update them,
> and seeing entries being made should help encourage other operators to also
> deploy IPv6.

Yes. Uploading your IR.21 database with IPv6 capable and IPv4v6
capable is definitely helpful. Should this be encouraged in the draft?

Gang

> Ross
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email