IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Thu, 07 August 2014 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D61B2B3D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t7cmizuHJuQ4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7127F1B2B3B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hi2so5073564wib.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 06:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IY8KEtlq79nhNwXYvK5v7ESlZdM5bBFfzzGZxG66tDA=; b=Z/B7q3bxh7jD7yff3GWf0LreeTINMAfIjV4EgOEZA5njUzUuBCqb+Vqzj/V4q/cgKe CADd8hM68csKWa0vNUgOEFfHeOa/WaMJgwWahd6fAoOQtFm76HTYV03llOSt9iMG9fbz k5v5SOHOv5ixELKV4v8mKsiQQauTIiW3/0hyohoc5WMVpc7veOdSH50g3ZlfDd1IIBuO i+9+2TZ7x0AANNxmMStLS/gwQrjq9KVgjuo0FyHfKMNXm5Es0z9PW6Bq9F4W1AQarDFp X0iYbIZN2M5lvDzj0pSSNooZotnP6h+sFpgBcw3el/wbnnc1CKatU+yWcfBVyARvIZqH j0wQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.89.106 with SMTP id bn10mr24787895wjb.121.1407419936091; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 06:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.49.133 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.49.133 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DB26AAFC-084D-46D6-BBF5-E5C20B5857AF@eircom.net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408060856080.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se> <53E1D951.8030200@fud.no> <3f59106bc21840dfb144c7933215294f@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <53E27522.4070901@fud.no> <84A403BD-7E93-4D99-8C11-FB7F91B68154@eircom.net> <0CEE83E4-FA58-4D85-B753-1F218540C624@eircom.net> <53E30E74.7050502@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTjYTzDRC_UbmmwiafAYch-VH=_sOaMWu+tMOQNrcEOCQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB26AAFC-084D-46D6-BBF5-E5C20B5857AF@eircom.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 06:58:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQUKP8AkYLsq8PjWWUac9163SeUn4tO1fyWLJC8rsF12Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0102e29857361905000a7d2e"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jdb7gpWeH4eMcIRNesyRUDJ8ctU
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:58:59 -0000

On Aug 7, 2014 6:17 AM, "Ross Chandler" <ross@eircom.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 7 Aug 2014, at 13:56, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree, for my own phone, i roam internationally with no issue on ipv6.
>>
>> CB
>
> Cameron,
>
> Are you saying the support for IPv6 in the user-plane for visitors is
good enough for enthuasists willing to toggle their APN protocol setting
when they roam or that the position is already so good that we can all
start copying Telenor?
>
> BR
> Ross

If Telenor has taken this leadership position, then i expect those few
lingering issues to be resolved quickly with the problem network operators.

It is worth revisiting the data before changing default settings.

In my own network,  roaming makes up for a very small percentage of ip
address usage, so the benefit is not very high

CB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email