Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net> Tue, 05 August 2014 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ross@eircom.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BFE1B2977 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sSX4wQW351-G for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail19.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail19.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C781D1B298B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 36866 messnum 323447 invoked from network[213.94.190.12/avas01.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 5 Aug 2014 15:30:13 -0000
Received: from avas01.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (213.94.190.12) by mail19.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 36866) with SMTP; 5 Aug 2014 15:30:13 -0000
Received: from mac1.home.ross.net ([159.134.196.35]) by avas01.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net with Cloudmark Gateway id b3WA1o00D0mJ9Tz013WDoA; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:30:13 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8EFBF376-257C-41A5-A577-54B7A5D6E278"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:30:06 +0100
Message-Id: <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pfIJIYoNuFs_BsKyPgkyQjuNyHQ
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:30:17 -0000

On 5 Aug 2014, at 16:08, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> Make that four, Telenor Norway has been doing IPv6-only/NAT64/464XLAT
>> since early June.
>> 
>> http://www.telenor.no/privat/kundeservice/mobilhjelp/internettpamobilen/feilsokingmmsoginternett.jsp
>> 
>> 
> 
> This is excellent.  Well done Telenor.
> 

The APN roaming protocol setting for “telenor.mobil” listed at that URL says it is IPv6.

Is that really their setting? AFAIK the Android UE or more accurately the RIL it calls doesn’t fallback to IPv4 when IPv6 is explicitly requested.


Ross