IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C25C1B279B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JjIF12nuISjS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BC21B2794 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f51so5388899qge.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QdsaRxLxayDVKN8cEgUUmhED8w8ybM0vhX8jeRleki4=; b=lPkifDE6ZnnKZ0ozHKm5YG4COKxkk+kHkANZIB+SycjM8HhwHDaVJyYPDPnHGnY2ZE q9uYtfLRtwh2Ugvl/k7vnk/Xl+/56KgYBx7ckfg0j6WvybTDpxwzSiOUxLNgX6P209Qk NFVZ8HAAqvOlJqqakLC9F6KTNi7LTtYWZNGqq95YO4Pb3xKzGh8la0fixmaEI9nFFKUs fos6P/RYjrLkreDXMjVkkEEVtbL/BKkRXXf0XyV7AUoEPNL+6FCQMiALUfvtD6JyinwV Fv21Dnh9/Ui5wOepvKtmi9m8M6M37C8Gij0WO/l1dtPib3FuylFnDL43kyvLeDxxsOCN HyVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.40.210 with SMTP id x76mr18269828qgx.61.1407459115405; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.46.10 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B650CA16-AB89-41B1-8DEC-BBB782B21E64@eircom.net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408060856080.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se> <53E1D951.8030200@fud.no> <3f59106bc21840dfb144c7933215294f@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <53E27522.4070901@fud.no> <84A403BD-7E93-4D99-8C11-FB7F91B68154@eircom.net> <0CEE83E4-FA58-4D85-B753-1F218540C624@eircom.net> <53E30E74.7050502@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTjYTzDRC_UbmmwiafAYch-VH=_sOaMWu+tMOQNrcEOCQ@mail.gmail.com> <f6347a8cb7cf49f19bc994efc6b66a25@BLUPR04MB596.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <B650CA16-AB89-41B1-8DEC-BBB782B21E64@eircom.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 08:51:55 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMEQ4oc6xBL-N75CLNdC1JSgfDRAD9frtXFqMkk+_E5bLrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>, Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Ms77MCH6Y41lglbEOZX5V9sKpv4
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:51:58 -0000

2014-08-07 21:35 GMT+08:00, Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>:
>
> On 7 Aug 2014, at 14:16, Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com> wrote:
>
>> When I’m abroad, I always make a point to test all operators on IPv6-only
>> and always see a lot of failure. This becomes especially apparent if the
>> home operator performs some steering of roaming targeted to an operator
>> that doesn’t allow IPv6.
>> Dave Michaud
>
> Steering of roaming sounds like a failure mode that should be mentioned in
> the draft.


Are you using VPLMN-Dynamic-Address-Allowed flag to steer roaming?



> BR
> Ross
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email