Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

[Ray Hunter <[e-mail]>]

Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Tore Anderson
>
>> Eerily good timing... I just started working on this again today, as it
>> happens. What I'm looking at now is two drafts, the one that's already
>> there for a single-translation network-only implementation, plus another
>> one describing an extension very similar to 464XLAT that would allow
>> NAT-incompatible and/or IPv4-only applications to be used in an
>> otherwise IPv6-only data centre.
>
> Here you go:
>
> http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/toreanderson/ietf/blob/master/siit-dc.html
> http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/toreanderson/ietf/blob/master/siit-dc-2xlat.html
>
> XML sources and .txt formats at https://github.com/toreanderson/ietf/.
>
> They're work in progress obviously, I haven't uploaded them to the I-D
> repository yet. It would be nice if you and Lee could have a chat with
> the sunset4 chairs and agree on which WG is the most appropriate first.
> (I have no particular preference, but I want it done Right.)
>
> Comments, criticisms, suggestions, pull requests would be very welcome!
>
> Tore
I see these conceptually as partner documents to 464xlat (on the server 
side, rather than the eyeballs side). I therefore think it would be 
useful to bring these documents into v6ops as I-D's, especially if 
real-world operational deployment experience could be included.

-- 
Regards,
RayH