IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> Thu, 07 August 2014 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tore@fud.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C13D1B2A6B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 03:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ak6nZlDC5wew for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 03:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from greed.fud.no (greed.fud.no [IPv6:2a02:c0:1001:100::145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABACE1B2A5D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 03:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a02:c0:2:1:1194:17:0:1000] (port=60683 helo=echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com) by greed.fud.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tore@fud.no>) id 1XFLNm-00008T-6F; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:57:18 +0200
Message-ID: <53E35B3D.3080903@fud.no>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:55:57 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <53E0C548.9050706@fud.no> <5C9FC57A-0DA5-4D36-84AE-CF1D6D17FB44@eircom.net> <53E1C587.4000506@fud.no> <3EC4EB99-F877-478D-BFE6-959F58127579@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <3EC4EB99-F877-478D-BFE6-959F58127579@eircom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9k7MV_af4kinJsYqlV9YLK2cMdM
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:57:21 -0000

* Ross Chandler

> Good, glad that you cleared that up. Include them in the next
> revision of your draft?

Certainly - what do you think about this?

http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/toreanderson/ietf/blob/master/siit-dc.html#rfc.appendix.B

Tore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email