IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 06 August 2014 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1901B29F4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 05:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QhM4MYG-v316 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 05:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A798C1A007E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 05:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E0860960 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 14:32:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB246093F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 14:32:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 83318 invoked by uid 1007); 6 Aug 2014 14:32:43 +0200
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:32:43 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Message-ID: <20140806123243.GU51793@Space.Net>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <53E0C548.9050706@fud.no> <5C9FC57A-0DA5-4D36-84AE-CF1D6D17FB44@eircom.net> <53E1C587.4000506@fud.no> <m1XEy8M-0000AXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m1XEy8M-0000AXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/biksKLCdH8JL4NJ4AGX6XEqmq8M
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:32:48 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:07:45PM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote:
> As far as I can tell, your proposal maps every public IPv4 address to a
> unique IPv6 address.
> 
> In that context, why not just use, for example, host routes to route IPv4
> traffic to the right interface of an IPv4 host.

Why do you find it so hard to accept that "dual-stack inside" is not
a desirable property?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email