IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 01:24 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554FC1B28F9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7hMJ8hNm1M_E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D671A1A037C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so4977283wgh.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BXivhYXCA9BuaMVsmvPlvz5FWrPAsE6Td0HH+y/mgtA=; b=XIxubW96Nr0NsT9DNPq4ovJdhNYJj68z15YVSiHvDLCKC4hzEuCX0EpFAlPBTxcYhl K3rU6OnCEPCcJDpokF1CELlKOk4ItaBdJa58MjpPxfVXoANIR1lOtiiz3MfJt2e3TEbF YNqsCf/n8a9gbDRqaIZjwJaum+3YLPcxBcOydtnqBnrMqO3F7FklsG2DfZ/hfQBA3yX6 SxLkvM86qRkBQbcEzdxo+Onxl8kqkspmt+kgaxJo98JYIbTGWPvk1rYeCOTmOYw0AbTo 3wYYkV1BseatfvtJZPaxnYGxuLL2fxRsRkeKS8A8PKyUMdGGSdAH0iGBZbqAjyKzsd8f cVGg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.200.229 with SMTP id jv5mr28002152wjc.90.1407461049550; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.49.133 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.49.133 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr0E9gOXGHaKOGnp77p2hBsqUSsifHtqvi+-xmYM7LyYuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <CAKD1Yr0E9gOXGHaKOGnp77p2hBsqUSsifHtqvi+-xmYM7LyYuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:24:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGTCe4kDrVcYqKU8ORPywm=b=Ltowc5-+hL0NZaAzniECA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb70b68e4ce300500140f18"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SzsMdrThuAvJHW7YAi0AifDGT9Y
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Consensus on deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 01:24:13 -0000

On Aug 7, 2014 5:26 PM, "Lorenzo Colitti" <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
>>
>> I've not visited every country in the world, but I have been around a
>> bit, and I've made a point out of trying to establish an IPv6 data
>> bearer to every single PLMN I can register with. So far I've had 100%
>> success, including on Cameron's network... Thus enabling IPv6 roaming
>> doesn't seem like a scary proposition to me. I'm guessing perhaps
>> Telenor came to the same conclusion.
>
>
> I know for sure it doesn't work with on NTT docomo. It used not to work
on Softbank either. That was 2 out of 2 GSM operators in Japan, so if you
had a GSM handset, well, no Internet for you.

A fix is to choose softbank as a roaming partner and to bar ntt

CB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email