IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 24 December 2020 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7A23A0E78 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:39:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pp1rCSrEFMLx for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:39:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2A903A0E7A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:39:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id d8so804633otq.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:39:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xKwECr5/eqA2MXJI46lxHq6n3hXlfosSS0sFQp1ZY1E=; b=r+1PtsZBthj8EUKyv1TfB/vKdvd3qwqXmamfRpKJEKMDNlotfqKHgeVrUOZOIWspGI FZEfMOmEQNUYjpTLhiVeKbKlThDpjbaXp/jTeeJiTSNFFX5xrZ7e6DP8KXHEBv9KDcfx ywIxhyMr46H1V4MzvE7j+NVsOv2/uyfmsUQnC99eAwMaEnMGVn1JHij7wjFuJ5/zyGiB /u15oaP6XIh+paAxh4TcYoDPRF5axS07UIcYktrdsGk7zwIzttxxkYST7nXcc27eVVLZ c+vz/IaVobNu2hAJoxTY/I0gObl2xCXB4c1t7HXnVCJeRn7Dnd/OrFtcwmATXaCjrCN6 pXMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xKwECr5/eqA2MXJI46lxHq6n3hXlfosSS0sFQp1ZY1E=; b=TtBl23O8cRI4C8NQiJnD/rxHuKETGYfUyzvJ0caHqYIi2UIxoRgrPog5VzpKB+pkOy m5OpCK5WYorxjtRFfhxtOwYLa3Cff7qsK0Qjq71t0+uQcnu2mwwZoNktTpiyk7VN0cMX tAEpLbZwg9MabCFhSd7doimClXeKvRSV0hKwFj8djgNFaY7uC6OKf7GG/ib7MS6RvbT1 ZPMFq2M1n9r8Ap9n+OcREe/g06Z+Svo6e9/kaf8nLNH2WDVDEBp/jOPSzTcevtXnSCJ8 jcYLFBTg43LZ/6lC/ld9sps32XfTyPEVyyNx2R1Ov7hQc2z7SYeBR1QgAWpkZZGXsKED tSew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532DjBtTGyLo5fqbwjr+qljOmRhBsTOqRNCpw8FQGV0HkIrXKiq6 nkWwsT06QQIOzVUWUb+Wk1+/zHCbVZ0A8nn0GG4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+KLrkA/0+w9Hf3P5WH7hNxbUZFyFGB2E/oFFldC0w7UzlvLdOHBXgqo0gH9Hw3fVN2oEohLXZbzHxmU/hi5g=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3ef6:: with SMTP id b109mr21730108otc.288.1608777553965; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:39:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <e6880ba9-f5f3-1050-25c0-658551187512@tana.it> <6bba023-d3d9-63a5-8441-11dac9a05e28@taugh.com> <74051a64-871a-db72-b5d9-1be374e23015@tana.it> <a323077-9b64-555b-3561-62cdc93819fd@taugh.com> <a8281e16-9417-5189-df73-79ea0a865fbd@tana.it> <c713b9ae-a364-1ae0-e79-55f61624aa3d@taugh.com> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwYDeV9CmFg9qCCGPse00JV30WRiSC4orC-EitK=hiahgA@mail.gmail.com> <a79dd75-4d73-d1dc-d6b1-272de866b950@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwZXu3FxH7QGBS7PGbeDwfDTGmC=rbPEQidVV4eDJNHLUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYeK2cJb+easc=mqCi4ap1932LmbDdfxM1dFZKrdo2a2mw@mail.gmail.com> <acfe3d9e-97eb-50ee-26a2-568fdd8359dd@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <acfe3d9e-97eb-50ee-26a2-568fdd8359dd@taugh.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:39:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GJ62jt=dL9Gzuw_O7USNbS=86BqAzu8Rdv9sCb5OpCdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a0771305b72cb6e8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/FvYdyyb0Pl8mzvH0yf9Q11vs-J8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 02:39:16 -0000

I Believe I agree with the current version, but can someone post what we
think is the final text?

tim


On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 9:12 PM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Dotzero wrote:
> > Based on my experience, I disagree that failure reports are marginal and
> > seldom used. It's kind of like an iceberg, mostly below the surface. ...
>
> Seems to me that if we splice in Ned's tweaked privacy language, we're
> done.  I don't see any reason to change the technical spec.  People will
> send what they send, and it's become clear that we have nothing useful to
> say about what one might redact.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status