IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 29 December 2020 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BACD3A145E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:25:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QR-B3q2T7sOw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8D03A145C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id b5so1751606pjk.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:25:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=+fBtLOGv448i2na02s5lHy7T6tqHI+vxVXw/rB7JkXQ=; b=eWfhWFPrfY33qf3+B9nzrI6vB71j7/rnD448+hQQxoKgfQKcTj4m3fXw7DgvB6SD2j hQpfNDyd0XgHwn6Pq9SZA5WZINSTKFvHvAo5HAhmlS3SDOa/foy/B2M0nstn+bV9fccp p0hKw7rIdJplnpQVLyO/Ybaff+R1exr9uDm/C8B/XjSFyer8kvM2uoOqZWbaKs5uNwhD JCgDJwcQmYnT9rOID/PSFFLKWZrNYaLBBGl59fNzoYxp+ulQFvReZ9/J26jVnKO2x7EP KcQNfAbZIJRUfCF+YxVobJsW/BbDyZIpzMtBEb49ZkiH8HzGCM5bb4JX2oFgzjl132B2 H83w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=+fBtLOGv448i2na02s5lHy7T6tqHI+vxVXw/rB7JkXQ=; b=KaSRpmcC3w0LDlSyMmw/kx2j+cDFVdvrgsmHNckxZ+/ZqKq6UKO5ars0hNylJBpvQd ZVlEWPYkwbvI5dDl0hgjtahILaXoIAjgmqNWeUiem1VuQuS8PXjp0+Nu0JkKK+zn1Cwb sdTkcerNJbpL9Aa0aTQNBdVJG8Xzjn+XxypvHatLibOgwOSvtZWA2d5je5JLZMMHx6QP JUQwl/2Tuz3xD7XJTS42rF/UgMELsFUh0Pwj7u/kr8hNqUJ1eEfn2mMaFUkC1Z4Bxkiw 9raCmECtktEot6bDRZcEiU2S2ROA6CZZgdkY7ljI6W5IUnX0jvKSHgznhFiCXBcGxl/v cvVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ystdMMZZreRVyehPSEy4XcLS/6rK7jXYMjIgW5ZzuCzhg90QX 4uCyjPWy1GISejWz6pEPbufRzz/BOgU0ug==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBMTyPDVLJU0BiY3NUljUnQrM+444r/dUYrnqm3wnJuBr8oQbi1T6N/ePI/OYEgPIiw2Qxag==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d58c:: with SMTP id v12mr4694662pju.37.1609259107764; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan ([107.182.37.0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a26sm39454164pgd.64.2020.12.29.08.25.06 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwYDeV9CmFg9qCCGPse00JV30WRiSC4orC-EitK=hiahgA@mail.gmail.com> <a79dd75-4d73-d1dc-d6b1-272de866b950@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwZXu3FxH7QGBS7PGbeDwfDTGmC=rbPEQidVV4eDJNHLUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYeK2cJb+easc=mqCi4ap1932LmbDdfxM1dFZKrdo2a2mw@mail.gmail.com> <acfe3d9e-97eb-50ee-26a2-568fdd8359dd@taugh.com> <CADyWQ+GJ62jt=dL9Gzuw_O7USNbS=86BqAzu8Rdv9sCb5OpCdw@mail.gmail.com> <d4a00be5-bd61-0c05-3431-8d56b39a3550@tana.it> <8813331f-f5e4-faa5-c6d-11212fc25797@taugh.com> <5d150251-427c-5c44-a0c3-ad2e7f24b692@tana.it> <01RTP8I70EYI004QVR@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAL0qLwafqVOGtzfM=2N6fB1pHcQJ6RRXpJeFBGh9qkTQ0wbnTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <8fdba260-7698-19d9-14da-14fbaf751a31@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:25:05 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwafqVOGtzfM=2N6fB1pHcQJ6RRXpJeFBGh9qkTQ0wbnTw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B81A59A0EE54E0FCE796DCE1"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/xU6FNVASU9k_vk51miPYLqFOX7I>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:25:11 -0000

On 12/28/20 11:03 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:23 AM <ned+dmarc@mrochek.com 
> <mailto:ned%2Bdmarc@mrochek.com>> wrote:
>
>     P.S. I hadn't looked at RFC 6589 before, and I  have to say I find its
>     standards-track status to be nothing short of astonishing. How on
>     earth do you
>     assess interoperability?
>

Ned -- rfc6589 is a ipv6 informational doc. which rfc are you actually 
referring to?

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email