IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 23 December 2020 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDD73A0E77 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 01:16:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jt5NtkyX93gK for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 01:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A436E3A0E7A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 01:16:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1608714969; bh=vak0CrnmHxdiiuIoopLD2z/S5x2Hj3ZRXGx948bNeRE=; l=465; h=To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BGfwfFW08KveYENKR+j+od2JVsT05s+O41aUU3yHEHPeMgHUpT1cG+P7psUt3XDFX Dl8cIiWdHLmeN4Dynf9WqBJMlsOiJZBgWLb9NWL7kaFwpPPatVgvQvDVnoKBIFeWQh 9n32TF86TtQ9bgFO5Gi7piKJU56t2LLCg1R5obtIkjK9h3SOq8d1HdyORPqh8
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Original-Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0CC.000000005FE30AD9.000053E6; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:16:08 +0100
To: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <4a43ffaa-3987-c892-cce7-56f18888cdf5@tana.it> <39125012-e356-d62d-36fd-a7ff25a9f59f@taugh.com> <e6880ba9-f5f3-1050-25c0-658551187512@tana.it> <6bba023-d3d9-63a5-8441-11dac9a05e28@taugh.com> <74051a64-871a-db72-b5d9-1be374e23015@tana.it> <a323077-9b64-555b-3561-62cdc93819fd@taugh.com> <a8281e16-9417-5189-df73-79ea0a865fbd@tana.it> <c713b9ae-a364-1ae0-e79-55f61624aa3d@taugh.com> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <448eeae1-2d82-91d3-4adf-cb547acd427a@mtcc.com> <c929bfa4-9b32-5099-01fa-078c56191571@tana.it> <0bf9fb2e-9974-4db3-3165-78508de3547c@mtcc.com> <44d92626-a13c-64e7-b1de-07cd50b1fd20@tana.it> <CABuGu1ox4Vq9op+Vdutv7J38cW4qcW01KtaznHtNeMnpvL-+_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <7c5f5933-2754-a7d5-b0e6-4b67c48873dd@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:16:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1ox4Vq9op+Vdutv7J38cW4qcW01KtaznHtNeMnpvL-+_g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/XSEFLxfuRIL0u8s16vbLGnw20PI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:16:19 -0000

On Tue 22/Dec/2020 20:33:35 +0100 Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:00 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
> 
>> Making specifications that cannot be legally abided by is in IETF scope?
> 
> Sure - RFC 7258. Unless you want to play the semantic card of BCP vs.
> specification.


I don't get it.  Do you mean that failure reporting can be assimilated to 
pervasive monitoring, and deserves mitigation as such?


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email