IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 03 January 2021 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863CF3A0FF8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 08:09:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=THeoxzqC; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=MeEbZI4D
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zlHJ_GOTI1qW for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 08:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A7CD3A0FF7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 08:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 56169 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2021 16:09:23 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=db58.5ff1ec33.k2101; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=ix7Lj82uouOEjR9lTvXniPEJNsH+/0lhhikuolvyN9M=; b=THeoxzqCK3MlCSzcCLuCWuS74UuQDEy2fdFaV8emecd7qganp5aYaOvi+O4SbKj7CmpSPM7eYyinpkuBqePz4QwAj77S5YH/Bb+LanvAOy+VVVWJjk4zkMvZWNsGk845aBaV0Wf3CoOG29ERqOTFQReygJbzCvXtyDejbQd7tD0uEjjPMBTnbQ7gsIpt5ScZ+7YWQwhaOJmYA9m+UPNI8GtBOJtLDnvKxbcMbZe48JXvP/24Gvu8zLv017kk4y+4oPIW95bedqkSf/HOLnSGxeKCuQOgiv6qs2hqxLdiMQp1rOFvv2lDEoxZMsZVw8biauvwPNJXGZJJhplPD9M7Lg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=db58.5ff1ec33.k2101; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=ix7Lj82uouOEjR9lTvXniPEJNsH+/0lhhikuolvyN9M=; b=MeEbZI4DX7WdPU7sBqzSrihO/nOsjKClHMbLNqDp7zQU5rOG78SL6XegkipncH6a8akUlHTeq8Tu69rOBUL7chEkwbhRVBHpTNS2P1RYdlCVak5smSYpqBW/d3GSUWHW/135kNJLycvPTiGc9cDoJ0RMW1kkOWMsdsqSVDXbNhuQFJciD2WCM7PWTEjUsGyvkgZhclpEBpH0i9MbPYlQXE83CmVVw4esmXDC5BfeCUvw8bsa8Pl2dN+Wbdw6zbT54Ubw/XlvIPMgoSJOg41RnFs5rXDAMdpr/sO3ifybAHAcQGBpX7O9GeS/LtxDgzHfR9+Adeirb7fwvhoM6ozbUg==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 03 Jan 2021 16:09:22 -0000
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 11:09:22 -0500
Message-ID: <f2c5b41a-c564-44c4-a215-8357cb0e576@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8ef62775-9109-9fdf-6c1f-6c7cd7e92957@tana.it>
References: <20210102184719.7CACA4A147E9@ary.qy> <8ef62775-9109-9fdf-6c1f-6c7cd7e92957@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UxvszDgI346qZZig5AuvLO-3zJw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 16:09:27 -0000

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> I don't think so.  There is a very practical outcome.  We should expand 
> Section 9.5, "Interoperability Issues" and say something actually workable.

With some trepidation I ask, like what?

If it's anything like telling mailing lists how to rewrite From lines, 
the answer is no.  That's way out of scope.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

PS: 10.5

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email