IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 22 December 2020 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410473A123D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:33:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BSEvRlVboRMF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:33:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11433A1239 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:33:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id t9so12998875ilf.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:33:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C5sCenDVBykW6bFdtAgmC4XQ4KIAM52yDjduppVt+nw=; b=gMhuVeICq+Yi9iGVAYpcHAOd5vVwdgc2j0NgXWP3pCoqwUXcyT2xNe+xi/Kzlpu0ZF HVF1WcJqNS45hadAfleqBQx0gJjaxOIeOWzVNc5iVrwnuTvRjVA3kVg3mtCSc7jy+isg X/jOuCUjAosvjXswraKnjnt0SS7X65CO1bW04=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C5sCenDVBykW6bFdtAgmC4XQ4KIAM52yDjduppVt+nw=; b=s0SOVyP9v7YLuez4VOweMBe5OPy9L1hF7RcR02F07+U/mbvG8HISpuB2TPH36gJh3o A6w+gz4E1CI5b2cY7deRd+iWeFyrNc/dhxz5SCUkw2+eIIbyG+yFiJJ3pQi5b85EGy/Q fcKhbCbzaT0CLIwusQdSdlIDret8mcdYqRKtczQ8tg5f4PGIlzHEB+3zxmt4sWw9MtyA BnsBadzUZodpbsulLmT1JdD1+gDrpBLNPtw32ycFDyDhv81rhzSlSYgTVPnNH987e76p uzWSO5Foi3zn2wzODmwO5slQntkUTDy/6dKcluxAB1XTaEjOxqcQ3+Jl0ngO63s1pQU+ RuBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qOb5NIqugYyaQ3HC4LmEbG7pk7QwJ16rC9py7vc0Ku6TF7Hpj DX+djLakENsfLpoeihUqCpS0ynwWI7VMbdC/eab8N5mJ9SXI3w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+0+PSvp42IqmUWM5IQlNNblE5zG+RQyBeL3+VBKAzFbf2jcwjRhqs0C7z3J26C29lSwybF1CAIUyR0lPNSyQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:152f:: with SMTP id i15mr22056601ilu.104.1608665636581; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:33:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <4a43ffaa-3987-c892-cce7-56f18888cdf5@tana.it> <39125012-e356-d62d-36fd-a7ff25a9f59f@taugh.com> <e6880ba9-f5f3-1050-25c0-658551187512@tana.it> <6bba023-d3d9-63a5-8441-11dac9a05e28@taugh.com> <74051a64-871a-db72-b5d9-1be374e23015@tana.it> <a323077-9b64-555b-3561-62cdc93819fd@taugh.com> <a8281e16-9417-5189-df73-79ea0a865fbd@tana.it> <c713b9ae-a364-1ae0-e79-55f61624aa3d@taugh.com> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <448eeae1-2d82-91d3-4adf-cb547acd427a@mtcc.com> <c929bfa4-9b32-5099-01fa-078c56191571@tana.it> <0bf9fb2e-9974-4db3-3165-78508de3547c@mtcc.com> <44d92626-a13c-64e7-b1de-07cd50b1fd20@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <44d92626-a13c-64e7-b1de-07cd50b1fd20@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:33:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1ox4Vq9op+Vdutv7J38cW4qcW01KtaznHtNeMnpvL-+_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d4cae405b712a7aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/YBtRz185OSDAJTi2n6PnTYNWJ9M>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:33:59 -0000

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:00 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>
> Making specifications that cannot be legally abided by is in IETF scope?
>

Sure - RFC 7258. Unless you want to play the semantic card of BCP vs.
specification.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email