IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] Censorship

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 11 March 2022 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8F33A13D6 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 06:02:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FAKE_REPLY_B=2.282, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4xA5NPHzgp1 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 06:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44233A13D5 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 06:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.172.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 22BE1mqj025501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 06:01:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1647007320; x=1647093720; i=@elandsys.com; bh=+LisS8IZQVfNdmskw3KO5LEBA97cPgVLLnPvNlHyLy0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=PvymJc1FB7W/ajcvGLHcFbAL2NB3nInQ95Cc0AtfkNr990QpzJlvJAgCVFLq1e9fn ZtH7AXzZAchR4BFHpXL9EFXA0mpVx8NYrxRrIm7lc1WwW+MdhUhB3RcH7O/PUBz6nP tuCGXZjA+Mheyh3Be5eWqKth/GHLceBQLaLBv9w0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20220311052822.15df48a8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 06:00:39 -0800
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>, hrpc@irtf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/5evug1dVt0iQ3HrsFcVvwBPDRoI>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Censorship
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:02:08 -0000

Dear Vittorio,

>I don't disagree with the concept, I would actually implement such a 
>blocklist. I am worried that such a structured approach, and some 
>names in the list of signatories, could weaponize the global 
>Internet governance institutions and lead to the final fragmentation 
>of the Internet, but this is not in topic here.

The document which you cited included "principles for Internet 
Infrastructure Governance sanctions".  "Internet Infrastructure 
Governance" is not decided by global Internet governance entities or 
institutions.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email