IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] Censorship

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Sun, 13 March 2022 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E4C3A1054 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 20:24:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pch.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Av_wXthJW8nJ for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 20:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E133A0FE9 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 20:24:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pch.net; s=mail; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to: references; bh=Kb4LeZZOJEHhlfWMY+ilr2gvgQD+dnivHgMLsdE+p4Y=; b=gd1M89P+xSRw/1p8cbNPy3TCyt1e9aoent2b3crV5E+MWLxG1807UzfI7OY7yzTXOxyTEZ7ctJTt9 R5vqEuYiXkbe0VSrB16VZ2c9K1u4dlIY++CixwkJEAPVa+zq02y5LulSf51Sdxa/PuN41ZMWTPnjHS Dj7G1OzowYhJ7r/qslkhjwPE76eTQfM0Xo+e5Akz5zjmn+3o+OF64u3q79mZr3R1g9CoUFrKxkcAwl fj7aa3D8imchFpgmMuOmgYunwIUz9wxV8k5pfuXs0gX+/pLZy7BWOCCCgnHF4m3u1vSXqtjRdyh/wC yCPNhjuGUThNamOkU00F8Gpd+bhMu+w==
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2620:171:202:6be4:391d:22b9:94ac:3eb2]) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.7 patch 3) with ESMTPS (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)); Sat, 12 Mar 2022 20:24:16 -0800
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5A633F2E-E6EE-4CAC-A6F2-589D412E6582"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <864236776.668071.1647107057618@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 05:24:13 +0100
Cc: Hrpc <hrpc@irtf.org>
Message-Id: <985F7C86-0B0E-4FAC-B61C-1E73574AC3E5@pch.net>
References: <1779273019.188450.1647022617139@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <AF3A93BB-04A7-4E5F-B88A-CD441369874E@nohats.ca> <7513968A-2E40-4509-963A-325C75240B4F@pch.net> <864236776.668071.1647107057618@mail.yahoo.com>
To: "b_jouris@yahoo.com" <b_jouris@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/PONqNnXKusAGmLWmP9wIT9maG10>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Censorship
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 04:24:22 -0000


> On Mar 12, 2022, at 6:44 PM, Bill Jouris <b_jouris=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Let's be serious.  ANY sanctions applied to a country are "collective punishment."

Hang on, really?  You’re saying that you view sanctions applied to the military of a country that’s conducting offensive military action, which occasioned the sanction, as “collective punishment?”

If so, at what degree of individuality do you believe sanctions must be applied in order to meet the test of not constituting collective punishment?

Or is no mass-murderer so vile as to warrant being inconvenienced in their online shopping?

                                -Bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email