IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] Censorship

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Fri, 11 March 2022 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332A93A0E5F for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:17:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tG0YJ93xBIA9 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (mx3.open-xchange.com [87.191.57.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC2293A0E44 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 345B16A0EE; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:16:57 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1647022617; bh=TxW7p23EbmWIM9+VWyhhTvRrQyYOT001gUClR5o0Pbk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=gSWQ0bgJF0dRMUw3gzbBo2tMKKsIOOA4kYlV/l6FOV5KMM0hDh7OU2hbqhO199Auv q7/ZAY+1LknxqBdVw8lYLjnSQ6mGuRmnJVvC/DzR+amWT5a8+DIVpcufDjN9ABXA1G +VENSyv9j/mYGLyh8aBAwjOASwYeg704NJlWL0pvJJUp3l1nZQ50pd3LBhmumr1lbF iBCGcnjzNS3efNNRpbqVCZSVYbt/4nEVE/1Son7VoSazoYcRGAlbf89uq7IAdkOrqA Q7uTVTR5h3axJ12nClE5KRAq0ZareBYHK0lROxm/8UNK/nW7mpPoIN6p/KjtPd8KZa iCd55fK6oDLAQ==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com ([10.20.28.82]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id OaduCxmSK2IhfAAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:16:57 +0100
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:16:57 +0100
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: "hrpc@irtf.org" <hrpc@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <1779273019.188450.1647022617139@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <FAFC98CE-1895-47F3-93E6-6A6ED8F7DB56@pch.net>
References: <669686052.184329.1646989079672@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <9f5fefa4-297f-5930-4ed1-354279b5d2dc@cs.tcd.ie> <FAFC98CE-1895-47F3-93E6-6A6ED8F7DB56@pch.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev9
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/SEEPKIbQYWprhFKVlwW6sOVl9bU>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Censorship
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:17:06 -0000


> Il 11/03/2022 17:38 Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> ha scritto:
> 
> So, just block everybody and let god sort them out?
> 
> Because that’s the status quo, and the problem we’re trying to fix.

As that seems to be your strongest motivation, I am curious to understand why. I mean, I agree that your proposal would be far better than Ukraine's, but as far as I know, almost no one at ICANN or at RIPE has argued in favour of removing TLDs from the root, invalidating certificates or deleting IP space. Both institutions have clearly said that, while sympathizing with Ukraine's situation, they will not agree to the request. So how is that "the status quo"?

Personally, my motivation for supporting your proposal would actually be the opposite - enabling limited but focused sanctions as an alternative to doing nothing.


-- vb.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email