Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 15:25 UTC
Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961313A2237 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3gYZjwiW3FU1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260803A222B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id j6-20020a17090adc86b02900cbfe6f2c96so7307066pjv.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=WGCM4+XKeLggn6DNXWyauO/KzPeOUoJZmCpbbE65ZK4=; b=Rz6WVZxMboAjZXwWXVEtajXmICOW8PChlhHIJtWMqAc4OChyliKfcNOkTGWQrYF3lf 68rDq22jpjGK2GpmTdqEc2hBJm+sZqA4NuZp3Iz6lO8qlt+tPPlBlGSbcFuHLgZLGxqV EOARay+YCs0d/Ik5OGAl/NtJETzshKxIDNwGAX9RkRIGX/nff6EH9KsvaNVA5sDRRDbg dCQqGGhwIdLnEjgGyeVZkg6/MVa57grqiUVEiYrpxVChCMl4Yl14BAwfrbiXQkSQSeTf f8+OFnr7pjXk1lK/OipU/xMAECWFHnskk6QyIjYJFhq8+BLNnqfz0MmW1qZD1TlU3nVN NTaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=WGCM4+XKeLggn6DNXWyauO/KzPeOUoJZmCpbbE65ZK4=; b=VdulSwAB+JZllrKQQw0fr93sAp/AT4LxBWzTpSpfnESrTbzBA9qX2tlxRJctQ9k0uh 4zaYOCddKSCFcuY8W4ENr44SDNs3eodIKSUYykmUMIVVmgbUOumDzqM2y/XB6lL1/66F 0b8cNeukf6UxkK64pZXddgEk3zn2tQA2CrpFNrE2jYG/PwHe947QkKhBl6fK0qv2bX5e pI0WSrVBRlLhIv837ljs1KHnowerWec+ySFFRkSVh4vigi0bUoqBFXGeDsIVXnEoSeq9 sG+DIbP+aAYPFUzN6qdvm9Xc4UBk1eTMnG3lw7qJk8WdaYmbyuQ5zgxKk1EK8yvmH1o4 c+ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DBtpi8oCNO0SU0Clfk6+cQFJ3RsbkYF3fnisUBJWufUT6I69g 5LuVNr3/uXMhOrb3nbP8JHQ4FSw6wnfh4Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5LSpscDEQ2QPXd6pK4jtZl/68WHJcmL7uxJSEzvWuL5QDjpzyxraPaSHR8TclNSfxEi+gvQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d05:: with SMTP id mw5mr29260656pjb.236.1618241106524; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-38-56.volcanocom.com. [107.182.38.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s13sm2117689pjl.48.2021.04.12.08.25.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20210412021224.GP9612@localhost> <31A7A397-747D-4099-A3A3-F845137022BD@akamai.com> <20210412002634.GO9612@localhost> <94707E61-D7D2-4494-B88C-E229C8D8F3E4@akamai.com> <YHPAoW8D7K1ew4mQ@straasha.imrryr.org> <3658907C-200F-4E11-8DAE-160D5C8CE429@akamai.com> <0be1a9e1-5e9b-7863-7cb8-4acc62ea94b0@mtcc.com> <CAMm+LwhpwOdxMV8LH6HowhRHoVYn-9MqGTqiYMOEsj=ifBopBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <b86a29c0-2029-d5f7-9f7b-9d100e7992ff@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:25:04 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhpwOdxMV8LH6HowhRHoVYn-9MqGTqiYMOEsj=ifBopBA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3EEC32E993389AAB3150CFDC"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7S1-6PSQubCO7REr5DzjwfjdCxM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:25:13 -0000
On 4/12/21 8:22 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:14 AM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com > <mailto:mike@mtcc.com>> wrote: > > So the whole world needs to revolve around somebody's corner case. > > > Welcome to my world. > > If you want to get this deployed, you are far more likely to make > progress by working out a way to meet Rich's need than by dismissing him. > > The fact that Rich's customers are shredding the DNS to get what they > need is itself rather significant. That is clearly a pain point and > thus a place where new solutions are likely to be of interest. > As I said, if certificates work better for your use case, use them. The rest of the world shouldn't be held hostage to somebody else's corner case. There is literally nothing that needs to be done to accommodate him. Mike
- Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: DNS vs PKI, was Quic: the elephant in the room John Levine
- Re: DNS vs PKI, was Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room David Conrad
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room David Conrad
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: th… Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic… Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Andrew McConachie
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Petite Abeille
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Marco Davids
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Salz, Rich
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality John C Klensin
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality John C Klensin
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Nico Williams
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… John Levine
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Petite Abeille
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Petite Abeille
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Andrew McConachie
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Patrik Fältström
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Eliot Lear
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Patrik Fältström
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Patrik Fältström
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… John R Levine
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Jim Fenton
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Masataka Ohta
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality Petite Abeille
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Nico Williams
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Donald Eastlake
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reali… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room Michael Thomas
- Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room Lars Eggert
- RE: Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room Phillip Hallam-Baker